Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (3):237-277 (2012)
|Abstract||Taking the lead from orthodox quantum theory, I will introduce a handy generalization of the Boolean approach to propositions and questions: the orthoalgebraic framework. I will demonstrate that this formalism relates to a formal theory of questions (or ‘observables’ in the physicist’s jargon). This theory allows formulating attitude questions, which normally are non-commuting, i.e., the ordering of the questions affects the answer behavior of attitude questions. Further, it allows the expression of conditional questions such as “If Mary reads the book, will she recommend it to Peter?”, and thus gives the framework the semantic power of raising issues and being informative at the same time. In the case of commuting observables, there are close similarities between the orthoalgebraic approach to questions and the Jäger/Hulstijn approach to question semantics. However, there are also differences between the two approaches even in case of commuting observables. The main difference is that the Jäger/Hulstijn approach relates to a partition theory of questions whereas the orthoalgebraic approach relates to a ‘decorated’ partition theory (i.e. the elements of the partition are decorated by certain semantic values). Surprisingly, the orthoalgebraic approach is able to overcome most of the difficulties of the Jäger/Hulstijn approach. Furthermore, the general approach is suitable to describe the different types of (non-commutative) attitude questions as investigated in modern survey research. Concluding, I will suggest that an active dialogue between the traditional model-theoretic approaches to semantics and the orthoalgebraic paradigm is mandatory.|
|Keywords||Attitude questions Commutativity Conditional questions Decorated partitions Orthoalgebra Orthodox quantum theory Qubit Question semantics Structured propositions Survey research|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Antti Koura (1988). An Approach to Why-Questions. Synthese 74 (2):191 - 206.
Charles B. Cross (1991). Explanation and the Theory of Questions. Erkenntnis 34 (2):237 - 260.
R. Nelken & N. Francez (2002). Bilattices and the Semantics of Natural Language Questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (1):37-64.
Laura Ruetsche (2002). Interpreting Quantum Field Theory. Philosophy of Science 69 (2):348-378.
Rani Nelken & Chung-Chieh Shan (2006). A Modal Interpretation of the Logic of Interrogation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (3):251-271.
Jonathan Ginzburg (1995). Resolving Questions, I. Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (5):459 - 527.
Maria Bittner (1998). Cross-Linguistic Semantics for Questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (1):1-82.
María Biezma & Kyle Rawlins (2012). Responding to Alternative and Polar Questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (5):361-406.
Dennis Temple (1988). The Contrast Theory of Why-Questions. Philosophy of Science 55 (1):141-151.
David Braun (2011). Implicating Questions. Mind and Language 26 (5):574-595.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads11 ( #107,331 of 722,704 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,704 )
How can I increase my downloads?