Which grammar has been chosen for neurological feasibility?
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):21-22 (2000)
| Abstract | Grodzinsky's hypotheses need different theories of grammar for comprehension and for production. These predictions are undesirable. Hungarian data are incompatible with the Trace Deletion Hypothesis. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesYael Sygal & Shuly Wintner (2009). Associative Grammar Combination Operators for Tree-Based Grammars. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18 (3).
Chris Barker & Pauline I. Jacobson (eds.) (2007). Direct Compositionality. Oxford University Press.
John J. Ross (2009). Reading Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations: A Beginner's Guide. Lexington Books.
Frederick J. Newmeyer (2000). Agent-Assignment, Tree-Pruning, and Broca's Aphasia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):44-45.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #275,053 of 551,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
