David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 24 (2):223-243 (2011)
Scientific psychology involves both identifying and classifying phenomena of interest (description) and revealing the causes and mechanisms that contribute towards these phenomena arising (explanation). Within personality psychology, some propose that aspects of behavior and cognition can be explained with reference to personality traits. However, certain conceptual and logical issues cast doubt upon the adequacy of traits as coherent explanatory constructs. This paper discusses ?explanation? in psychology and the problems of circularity and reification. An analysis of relations and intrinsic properties is then developed to address the logical requirements necessary for circumventing these problems. An examination of McCrae and Costa's defense of traits as explanatory constructs, in terms of ?tendencies? and ?dispositions? highlights logical issues that prevent traits, so defined, from explaining trait-like behaviors and cognitions. The logical requirements for a coherent trait-explanatory account are outlined and possible explanatory directions in trait-approaches are discussed. The ongoing tendency towards fallacious reasoning in psychology and suggestions for preventing this are further examined
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
William P. Alston (1975). Traits, Consistency and Conceptual Alternatives for Personality Theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 5 (1):17–48.
John Anderson (1962). Studies in Empirical Philosophy. [Sydney]Angus and Robertson.
Simon Boag (2007). 'Real Processes' and the Explanatory Status of Repression and Inhibition. Philosophical Psychology 20 (3):375 – 392.
Desmond M. Clarke (1989). Occult Powers and Hypotheses: Cartesian Natural Philosophy Under Louis Xiv. Oxford University Press.
Jerry A. Fodor (1986). The Modularity of Mind. In Zenon W. Pylyshyn (ed.), Meaning and Cognitive Structure. Ablex.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Harald Höffding & Mary E. Lowndes (2004). The Conscious and the Unconscious: From Outlines of Psychology (1881). American Imago. Special Issue 1750 (3):379-395.
James T. Lamiell (1987). The Psychology of Personality: An Epistemological Inquiry. Columbia University Press.
Matthew H. Erdelyi (2001). Defense Processes Can Be Conscious or Unconscious. American Psychologist 56 (9):761-762.
Michael Snodgrass, Edward Bernat & Howard Shevrin (2004). Unconscious Perception: A Model-Based Approach to Method and Evidence. Perception and Psychophysics 66 (5):846-867.
Lawrence J. Walker (1999). The Perceived Personality of Moral Exemplars. Journal of Moral Education 28 (2):145-162.
Andrei G. Khromov (2001). Logical Self-Reference as a Model for Conscious Experience. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 45 (5):720-731.
Bert Reynvoet, Wim Gevers & Bernie Caessens (2005). Unconscious Primes Activate Motor Codes Through Semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (5):991-1000.
Siegfried Zepf (2007). The Relationship Between the Unconscious and Consciousness: A Comparison of Psychoanalysis and Historical Materialism. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society 12 (2):105-123.
George I. Viamontes & Bernard D. Beitman (2007). This Issue: The Neurobiology of the Unconscious. Psychiatric Annals 37 (4):222-224.
George I. Viamontes & Bernard D. Beitman (2007). Mapping the Unconscious in the Brain. Psychiatric Annals 37 (4):234-256.
Marya Schechtman (2005). Community, Consciousness, and Dynamic Self-Understanding. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology. Special Issue 12 (1):27-29.
Daniel Holender & Katia Duscherer (2004). Unconscious Perception: The Need for a Paradigm Shift. Perception and Psychophysics 66 (5):872-881.
Thomas Natsoulas (2000). Freud and Consciousness: X. The Place of Consciousness in Freud's Science. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 23 (4):525-561.
Added to index2011-04-06
Total downloads26 ( #70,286 of 1,099,914 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #67,010 of 1,099,914 )
How can I increase my downloads?