Chrysippus' Modal Logic and Its Relation to Philo and Diodorus

In K. Doering & Th Ebert (eds.), Dialektiker und Stoiker. Franz Steiner. 63--84 (1993)
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The modal systems of the Stoic logician Chrysippus and the two Hellenistic logicians Philo and Diodorus Cronus have survived in a fragmentary state in several sources. From these it is clear that Chrysippus was acquainted with Philo’s and Diodorus’ modal notions, and also that he developed his own in contrast of Diodorus’ and in some way incorporated Philo’s. The goal of this paper is to reconstruct the three modal systems, including their modal definitions and modal theorems, and to make clear the exact relations between them; moreover, to elucidate the philosophical reasons that may have led Chrysippus to modify his predessors’ modal concept in the way he did. It becomes apparent that Chrysippus skillfully combined Philo’s and Diodorus’ modal notions, with making only a minimal change to Diodorus’ concept of possibility; and that he thus obtained a modal system of modalities (logical and physical) which fit perfectly fit into Stoic philosophy.
Keywords modal logic  necessity  temporal truth  Stoics  Diodorus Cronus  Chrysippus  Stoic logic  contingency  master argument  propositions
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Susanne Bobzien (1999). Logic: The Megarics. In Keimpe Algra & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Harry Ide (1992). Chrysippus's Response to Diodorus's Master Argument. History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (2):133-148.
    Susanne Bobzien (2011). The Combinatorics of Stoic Conjunction. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40 (1):157-188.
    A. N. Prior (1958). Diodorus and Modal Logic: A Correction. Philosophical Quarterly 8 (32):226-230.
    Graham Oppy (2007). Maydole’s Modal Perfection Argument (Again). Philo: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):72-84.
    Harry Deutsch (1994). Logic for Contigent Beings. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:273-329.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-10-26

    Total downloads

    72 ( #15,982 of 1,089,047 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    12 ( #9,280 of 1,089,047 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.