Graduate studies at Western
Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 4:489-516 (2005)
|Abstract||ABSTRACT: Although from the 2nd century BC to the 3rd AD the problems of determinism were discussed almost exclusively under the heading of fate, early Stoic determinism, as introduced by Zeno and elaborated by Chrysippus, was developed largely in Stoic writings on physics, independently of any specific "theory of fate ". Stoic determinism was firmly grounded in Stoic cosmology, and the Stoic notions of causes, as corporeal and responsible for both sustenance and change, and of effects as incorporeal and as predicates, are indispensable for a full understanding of the theory. Stoic determinism was originally not presented as causal determinism, but with a strong teleological element, in the context of a theory of natural motions, which makes use of a distinction between a global and an inner-worldly perspective on events. However, Chrysippus also employed his conception of causality in order to explicate his determinism, and can be shown to have maintained a universal causal determinism in the modern sense of the erm. The teleological and mechanical elements of early Stoic determinism were brought together in Chrysippus' conception of fate, which places elements of rationality in every cause|
|Keywords||determinism causation Chrysippus Stoic philosophy pantheism fatalism teleological determinism metaphysics causal determinism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Susanne Bobzien (1998). Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Brad Inwood (2000). Stoic Determinism S. Bobzien: Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy . Pp. XII + 441. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998. Cased, £48. Isbn: 0-19-823794-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (02):495-.
Susanne Bobzien (1999). Chrysippus' Theory of Causes. In Katerina Ierodiakonou (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Susanne Bobzien (1998). The Inadvertent Conception and Late Birth of the Free-Will Problem. Phronesis 43 (2):133-175.
Luis Xavier López-Farjeat (2007). Determinism and Free Will in Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Arabic Tradition. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:161-177.
John Sellars (2012). Stoics Against Stoics In Cudworth's A Treatise of Freewill. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):935-952.
Robert C. Bishop (2003). On Separating Predictability and Determinism. Erkenntnis 58 (2):169--88.
Sarah Broadie (2001). From Necessity to Fate: A Fallacy. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 5 (1):21-37.
Susanne Bobzien (1997). Stoic Conceptions of Freedom and Their Relation to Ethics. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 41 (S68):71-89.
Thomas A. Blackson (2000). Bobzien, Susanne. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. The Review of Metaphysics 53 (4):919-920.
Eric Brown (2000). Topics in Stoic Philosophy, And: Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (3):432-434.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads8 ( #131,816 of 739,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?