David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):317-338 (2008)
Leibniz defends concurrentism, the view that both God and created substances are causally responsible for changes in the states of created substances. Interpretive problems, however, arise in determining just what causal role each plays. Some recent work has been revisionist, greatly downplaying the causal role played by created substances—arguing instead that according to Leibniz only God has productive causal power. Though bearing some causal responsibility for changes in their perceptual states, created substances are not efficient causes of such changes. This paper argues against such revisionism; not only was Leibniz a consistent advocate of concurrentism (at least in his “mature” years), but also his account of concurrentism involves both God and created substances asefficient causes of the changes in the states of created substances
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Julia Jorati (2015). Leibniz on Causation – Part 1. Philosophy Compass 10 (6):389-397.
Similar books and articles
Julia von Bodelschwingh (2011). Leibniz on Concurrence, Spontaneity, and Authorship. Modern Schoolman 88 (3/4):267-297.
Laurence Carlin (2006). Leibniz on Final Causes. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):217-233.
Nicholas Okrent (2000). Leibniz on Substance and God in “That a Most Perfect Being Is Possible”. Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):79-93.
Ari Maunu (2008). Leibniz's Theory of Universal Expression Explicated. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):247-267.
Stephen Puryear (2010). Monadic Interaction. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):763-796.
Alfred J. Freddoso (1991). God's General Concurrence with Secondary Causes: Why Conservation is Not Enough. Philosophical Perspectives 5:553-585.
Justin E. H. Smith (2003). Confused Perception and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz. The Leibniz Review 13:45-64.
Shane Duarte (2009). Leibniz and the Fardella Memo. Studia Leibnitiana 41 (1):67-87.
Sukjae Lee (2004). Leibniz on Divine Concurrence. Philosophical Review 113 (2):203-248.
Andrew R. Platt (2011). Divine Activity and Motive Power in Descartes's Physics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):623 - 646.
Samuel Levey (2007). On Unity and Simple Substance in Leibniz. The Leibniz Review 17:61-106.
Donald Rutherford (1993). Natures, Laws, and Miracles: The Roots of Leibniz's Critique of Occasionalism. In Steven Nadler (ed.), Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Penn State University Press
Ohad Nachtomy (2012). Leibniz and Kant on Possibility and Existence. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):953-972.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads44 ( #97,538 of 1,911,321 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #319,111 of 1,911,321 )
How can I increase my downloads?