Time: M 10.169-247 - Notes On Sceptical Method and Doxographical Transmission in Sextus Empiricus' Chapters on Time
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Keimpe Algra & Katerina Ierodiakonou (eds.), Sextus Empiricus and ancient physics. Cambridge University Press (2015)
ABSTRACT: For the most part, this paper is not a philosophical paper in any strict sense. Rather, it focuses on the numerous exegetical puzzles in Sextus Empiricus’ two main passages on time (M X.l69-247 and PH III.l36-50), which, once sorted, help to explain how Sextus works and what the views are which he examines. Thus the paper provides an improved base from which to put more specifically philosophical questions to the text. The paper has two main sections, which can, by and large, be read independently. Each is about a topic which, to my knowledge, has so far not been treated in detail. The first section is concemed with the argument structures of the two main passages on time in Sextus, pointing out various irregularities in the overall argument in both passages, as well as parallels and differences, and asks the question what kinds of scepticism and sceptical methods we find in the various parts of each passage. The second section focuses on the doxographical accounts of time in the two passages: what they are, how they compare with surviving parallels, to what philosophers we can attribute those accounts for which Sextus himself provides either no, or more than one, possible ascriptions, and how Sextus treats the doxographical material. This discussion is inspired by the contributions Michael Frede offered on this topic the day before his untimely death
|Keywords||Sextus Time Doxography|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. Warren (2003). Sextus Empiricus and the Tripartition of Time. Phronesis 48 (4):313 - 343.
Alan Bailey (2002). Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism. Oxford University Press.
Sextus Empiricus (2000). Sextus Empiricus: Against the Ethicists. Clarendon Press.
Luciano Floridi (2002). Sextus Empiricus: The Transmission and Recovery of Pyrrhonism. Oxford University Press.
Guillaume Dye & Bernard Vitrac (2009). Le contre Les géomètres de sextus empiricus: Sources, cible, structure. Phronesis 54 (2):155-203.
Sextus Empiricus (1998). Sextus Empiricus: Against the Grammarians. Clarendon Press.
John Christian Laursen & Richard H. Popkin (1998). Sources of Knowledge of Sextus Empiricus in Kant's Time: A French Translation of Sextus Empiricus From the Prussian Academy, 1779. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (2):261 – 267.
Filip Grgic (2008). Sextus Empiricus on the Possibility of Inquiry. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):436-459.
Diego E. Machuca (2008). Sextus Empiricus: His Outlook, Works, and Legacy. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 55 (1/2):28-63.
Sextus (1997). Against the Ethicists: (Adversus Mathematicos Xi). Oxford University Press, Usa.
Filip Grgic (2006). Sextus Empiricus on the Goal of Skepticism. Ancient Philosophy 26 (1):141-160.
Renata Ziemińska (2011). Samorefutacja i starożytny sceptycyzm. Filozofia Nauki 3.
Sextus (1996). The Skeptic Way: Sextus Empiricus's Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2011-01-20
Total downloads309 ( #6,810 of 1,906,980 )
Recent downloads (6 months)55 ( #9,566 of 1,906,980 )
How can I increase my downloads?