The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments

Phronesis 42 (3):299-312 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In this paper I argue (i) that the hypothetical arguments about which the Stoic Chrysippus wrote numerous books (DL 7.196) are not to be confused with the so-called hypothetical syllogisms" but are the same hypothetical arguments as those mentioned five times in Epictetus (e.g. Diss. 1.25.11-12); and (ii) that these hypothetical arguments are formed by replacing in a non-hypothetical argument one (or more) of the premisses by a Stoic "hypothesis" or supposition. Such "hypotheses" or suppositions differ from propositions in that they have a specific logical form and no truth-value. The reason for the introduction of a distinct class of hypothetical arguments can be found in the context of dialectical argumentation. The paper concludes with the discussion of some evidence for the use of Stoic hypothetical arguments in ancient texts.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
765 (#18,246)

6 months
110 (#30,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susanne Bobzien
Oxford University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references