Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):605-626 (2000)
|Abstract||A notion of an epistemic state is introduced as a generalization of common representations suggested for belief change. Based on it, a new kind of nonmonotonic inference relation corresponding to belief contractions is defined. A number of representation results is established that cover both traditional AGM contractions and contractions that do not satisfy recovery|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Morreau (1998). Review of Isaac Levi, For the Sake of the Argument: Ramsey Test Conditionals, Inductive Inference and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 95 (10):540-546.
Charles B. Cross (2003). Nonmonotonic Inconsistency. Artificial Intelligence 149 (2):161-178.
Peter Gärdenfors (1986). The Dynamics of Belief: Contractions and Revisions of Probability Functions. Topoi 5 (1):29-37.
Sven Ove Hansson (1993). Theory Contraction and Base Contraction Unified. Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (2):602-625.
Sven Ove Hansson (1991). Belief Contraction Without Recovery. Studia Logica 50 (2):251 - 260.
John Pais (1992). Faithful Representation of Nonmonotonic Patterns of Inference. Minds and Machines 2 (1):27-49.
Sven Ove Hansson (1994). Kernel Contraction. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):845-859.
Eduardo Fermé, Karina Saez & Pablo Sanz (2003). Multiple Kernel Contraction. Studia Logica 73 (2):183 - 195.
André Fuhrmann & Sven Ove Hansson (1994). A Survey of Multiple Contractions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (1):39-75.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,563 of 739,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?