Law as a Bridge Between Is and Ought
Ratio Juris 1 (2):137-153 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Kevin Morris (2009). Does Functional Reduction Need Bridge Laws? A Response to Marras. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):647-657.
Edgar Bodenheimer (1940). Power and Law: A Study of the Concept of Law. Ethics 50 (2):127-143.
Alan Meisel (1988). A "Dignitray Tort" as a Bridge Between the Idea of Informed Consent and the Law of Informed Consent. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (3-4):210-218.
L. W. Hahn (1998). Revising Locus of the Bridge Between Neuroscience and Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):759-760.
Terence E. Horgan (1978). Supervenient Bridge Laws. Philosophy of Science 45 (2):227-249.
Edgar Bodenheimer (1973). Power, Law, and Society; a Study of the Will to Power and the Will to Law. New York,Crane, Russak.
Edgar Bodenheimer (1974). Jurisprudence: The Philosophy and Method of the Law. Harvard University Press.
Johan E. Gustafsson (2011). Phenomenal Continuity and the Bridge Problem. Philosophia 39 (2):289–296.
Edgar Bodenheimer (1940). Jurisprudence. London, Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
William P. Bechtel (1983). A Bridge Between Cognitive Science and Neuroscience: The Functional Architecture of Mind. Philosophical Studies 44 (November):319-30.
Edgar Bodenheimer (ed.) (1962). Readings in Jurisprudence. University of Utah.
Peter Fazekas (2009). Reconsidering the Role of Bridge Laws in Inter-Theoretical Reductions. Erkenntnis 71 (3):303 - 322.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-11Total downloads7 ( #133,421 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |

