Graduate studies at Western
Minds and Machines 19 (4):453-463 (2009)
|Abstract||It’s sometimes said, and even more often assumed, that life is necessary for mind. If so, and if A-Life promises to throw light on the nature of life as such, then A-Life is in principle highly relevant to the philosophy of mind and cognitive science. However, very few philosophers have attempted to argue for the relation between life and mind. It’s usually taken for granted. Even those (mostly in the Continental tradition, including some with a following in A-Life) who have insisted on the linkage have stated it rather than justified it. If an evolutionary account of intentionality is acceptable, then perhaps biological life ‘makes room’ for mind. But that claim is problematic, since it’s not clear that the type of self-organization involved in life-as-such must necessarily include evolution. Even if it does, it’s a further step to show that life is strictly necessary for mind.|
|Keywords||A-Life Evolution Intentionality Life Self-organization|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Protevi, Deleuze, Jonas, and Thompson Toward a New Transcendental Aesthetic and a New Question of Panpsychism.
Brooke Alan Trisel (2007). Judging Life and Its Value. Sorites (18):60-75.
Tom Froese & Ezequiel A. Di Paolo (2009). Sociality and the Life–Mind Continuity Thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (4):439-463.
Evan Thompson (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard University Press.
Gregory McCulloch (2003). The Life of the Mind: An Essay on Phenomenological Externalism. Routledge.
John Protevi, Mind in Life, Mind in Process: Toward a New Transcendental Aesthetic and a New Question of Panpsychism.
Margaret A. Boden (ed.) (1996). The Philosophy of Artificial Life. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-12-16
Total downloads39 ( #34,807 of 739,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,288 of 739,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?