A Thomistic Account of Anti-Love Biotechnology

American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):30-31 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Applies a generally Thomistic framework to Earp and colleagues' (2013) discussion of anti-love biotechnology. Discusses some of the constraints that should be placed on the use of such a technology from a Thomistic perspective.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Vice of In-Principlism and the Harmfulness of Love.John Danaher - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):19-21.
A Dispositional Theory of Love.Hichem Naar - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):342-357.
Which One is the Real One?Anthony J. Graybosch - 1990 - Philosophy and Theology 4 (4):365-384.
What is the point of love?Carolyn Price - 2012 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2):217-237.
Love’s Vision.Troy Jollimore - 2011 - Princeton University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-28

Downloads
17 (#742,366)

6 months
1 (#1,042,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brandon Boesch
Morningside College

Citations of this work

The Medicalization of Love.Brian D. Earp, Anders Sandberg & Julian Savulescu - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (3):323-336.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Summa Theologica.Thomasn D. Aquinas - 1273 - Hayes Barton Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
Natural law and natural rights.John Finnis - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Natural Law and Natural Rights.John Finnis - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
.Julian Savulescu - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Natural Law and Natural Rights.Richard Tuck - 1981 - Philosophical Quarterly 31 (124):282-284.

View all 9 references / Add more references