Debating the Desirability of New Biomedical Technologies: Lessons from the Introduction of Breast Cancer Screening in the Netherlands [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Health Care Analysis 20 (1):84-102 (2012)
Health technology assessment (HTA) was developed in the 1970s and 1980s to facilitate decision making on the desirability of new biomedical technologies. Since then, many of the standard tools and methods of HTA have been criticized for their implicit normativity. At the same time research into the character of technology in practice has motivated philosophers, sociologists and anthropologists to criticize the traditional view of technology as a neutral instrument designed to perform a specific function. Such research suggests that the tools and methods of more traditional forms of HTA are often inspired by an ‘instrumentalist’ conception of technology that does not fit the way technology actually works. This paper explores this hypothesis for a specific case: the assessments and deliberations leading to the introduction of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands. After reconstructing this history of HTA ‘in the making’ the stepwise model of HTA that emerged during the process is discussed. This model was rooted indeed in an instrumentalist conception of technology. However, a more detailed reconstruction of several episodes from this history reveals how the actors already experienced the inadequacy of some of the instrumentalist presuppositions. The historical case thus shows how an instrumentalist conception of technology may result in implicit normative effects. The paper concludes that an instrumentalist view of technology is not a good starting point for HTA and briefly suggests how the fit between HTA methods and the actual character of technology in practice might be improved.
|Keywords||Health technology assessment Methods Values Ethics Neutrality Evidence Mammography Breast cancer screening Instrumental view of technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter-Paul Verbeek (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State University Press.
Don Ihde (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press.
Marianne Boenink, Tsjalling Swierstra & Dirk Stemerding (2010). Anticipating the Interaction Between Technology and Morality: A Scenario Study of Experimenting with Humans in Bionanotechnology. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 4 (2).
Andrew Feenberg (1991). Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford University Press.
Annemaire Mol (2000). What Diagnostic Devices Do: The Case of Blood Sugar Measurement. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):9-22.
Citations of this work BETA
Ronan Le Roux (2015). A Matter of Accuracy. Nanobiochips in Diagnostics and in Research: Ethical Issues as Value Trade-Offs. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):343-358.
Similar books and articles
Leonhard Hennen (2004). Biomedical and Bioethical Issues in Parliamentary TA and in Health Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):207-220.
Bjørn Hofmann (2005). On Value-Judgements and Ethics in Health Technology Assessment. Poiesis and Praxis 3 (4):277-295.
Gert Jan van der Wilt, Rob Reuzel & H. David Banta (2000). The Ethics of Assessing Health Technologies. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):101-113.
Christian Clausen & Yutaka Yoshinaka (2004). Social Shaping of Technology in TA and HTA. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):221-246.
Rob P. B. Reuzel, Gert-Jan van Der Wilt, Henk A. M. J. ten Have & Pieter F. de Vries Robbé (1999). Reducing Normative Bias in Health Technology Assessment: Interactive Evaluation and Casuistry. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (3):255-263.
Armin Grunwald (2004). The Normative Basis of (Health) Technology Assessment and the Role of Ethical Expertise. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):175-193.
Federica Lucivero, Tsjalling Swierstra & Marianne Boenink (2011). Assessing Expectations: Towards a Toolbox for an Ethics of Emerging Technologies. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 5 (2):129-141.
Pedro Gallo (2004). Integrating Ethical Enquiry and Health Technology Assessment: Limits and Opportunities for Efficiency and Equity. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):103-117.
Irwin D. J. Bross (1987). Metatechnology: A Technollogy for the Safe, Effective, and Economical Use of Technology. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (2):145-153.
John Grin (2004). Health Technology Assessment Between Our Health Care System and Our Health: Exploring the Potential of Reflexive HTA. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):157-174.
Chris Gastmans (ed.) (2002). Between Technology and Humanity: The Impact of Technology on Health Care Ethics. Leuven University Press.
Megan Eide & Ann Milliken Pederson (2009). God, Disease, and Spiritual Dilemmas: Reading the Lives of Women with Breast Cancer. Zygon 44 (1):85-96.
Leslie E. Blumenson (1987). How Would a Latent Period for Early Breast Cancer Affect the Benefit of Screening? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (2):169-182.
Lisa S. Parker (1995). Breast Cancer Genetic Screening and Critical Bioethics' Gaze. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (3):313-337.
Don Ihde (2010). Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. Fordham University Press.
Added to index2012-02-11
Total downloads4 ( #575,966 of 1,911,645 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,010 of 1,911,645 )
How can I increase my downloads?