David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 15 (2):157 – 172 (2005)
Writing only decades apart, Han Feizi (ca. 250 BCE) and Kautilya (ca. 300 BCE) were two great political thinkers who argued for strong leaders, king or emperor, to unify warring states and bring peace, who tried to show how a ruler controls his ministers as well as the populace, defended the need for spies and violence, and developed the key ideas needed to support the bureaucracies of the emerging and unified states of China and India respectively. Whereas both thinkers disliked the new merchants, Han Feizi seems content with a traditional feudal economy, whereas Kautilya wanted to use the state to increase production and the wealth in the king's treasury. Kautilya also had much more extensive discussions of war and diplomacy.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Benjamin I. Schwartz (1985). The World of Thought in Ancient China. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Roger T. Ames (1988). The Art of Rulership: A Study in Ancient Chinese Political Thought. Philosophy East and West 38 (2):197-200.
Arthur Waley (1939/1982). Three Ways of Thought in Ancient China. Stanford University Press.
Roger Boesche (2002). The First Great Political Realist: Kautilya and His Arthashastra. Lexington Books.
Peter R. Moody (1979). The Legalism of Han Fei-Tzu and Its Affinities with Modern Political Thought. International Philosophical Quarterly 19 (3):317-330.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chang-Hee Son (2000). Haan (Han, Han) of Minjung Theology and Han (Han, Han) of Han Philosophy: In the Paradigm of Process Philisophy and Metaphysics of Relatedness. University Press of America.
Soon-Ja Yang (2011). Shen Dao's Own Voice in the Shenzi Fragments. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):187-207.
Eric Hutton (2008). Han Feizi's Criticism of Confucianism and its Implications for Virtue Ethics. Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (3):423-453.
Wiebke Denecke (2010). The Dynamics of Masters Literature: Early Chinese Thought From Confucius to Han Feizi. Distributed by Harvard University Press.
Paul R. Goldin (2001). Han Fei's Doctrine of Self-Interest. Asian Philosophy 11 (3):151 – 159.
N. Siva Kumar & U. S. Rao (1996). Guidelines for Value Based Management in Kautilya's Arthashastra. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (4):415 - 423.
Roger Boesche (2002). Moderate Machiavelli? Contrasting the Prince with the Arthashastra of Kautilya. Critical Horizons 3 (2):253-276.
Torkel Brekke (2004). Wielding the Rod of Punishment – War and Violence in the Political Science of Kautilya. Journal of Military Ethics 3 (1):40-52.
David Elstein (2011). Han Feizi's Thought and Republicanism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):167-185.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads92 ( #35,692 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #231,316 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?