David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (1-2):215-238 (2009)
A recent essay by Jürgen Habermas revisits political liberalism and takes up the question of the extent to which democratic citizens and officials should rely on their religious convictions in publicly deliberating about and deciding political issues. With his institutional translation proviso, a proposed alternative to Rawls' idea of public reason, Habermas hopes to dodge familiar (and often overstated) criticisms that liberal requirements of citizenship are unfair or disproportionately burdensome to religious believers. I argue that, due in part to its sharp contrast between the obligations attributed to political officials and those attributed to ordinary citizens, Habermas' position is beset by additional, quite considerable difficulties. I conclude that Habermas' account of religion in the public sphere does not present a genuine alternative to the leading liberal theory of citizenship and public reasoning.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Stéphane Courtois (2010). La religion dans l'espace public : quelques commentaires sur les positions récentes de Habermas. Dialogue 49 (01):91-112.
Similar books and articles
Richard North (2012). Public Reason, Religious Restraint and Respect. Philosophia 40 (2):179-193.
Jurgen Habermas (2011). Reconciliation Through the Public Reason : Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism. In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
J. Pedersen (2012). Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls-Habermas Debate. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):399-432.
Glen Pettigrove (2005). Rights, Reasons, and Religious Conflict. Social Philosophy Today 21:81-93.
Pieter Duvenage (2010). Communicative Reason and Religion: The Case of Habermas. Sophia 49 (3):343-357.
Nicholas Adams (2006). Habermas and Theology. Cambridge University Press.
John R. Wright (2002). Conflicts of Value and the Political Ideal of Citizenship. Social Philosophy Today 18:167-181.
Added to index2010-03-06
Total downloads63 ( #30,346 of 1,692,513 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #181,267 of 1,692,513 )
How can I increase my downloads?