David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Economics and Philosophy 24 (2):167-189 (2008)
Some empirical findings seem to show that people value health benefits differently depending on the age of the beneficiary. Health economists and philosophers have offered justifications for these preferences on grounds of both efficiency and equity. In this paper, I examine the most prominent examples of both sorts of justification: the defence of age-weighting in the WHO's global burden of disease studies and the fair innings argument. I argue that neither sort of justification has been worked out in satisfactory form: age should not be taken into account in the framework of the burden of disease measure, and on the most promising formulations of the fair innings argument, it turns out to be merely an indicator of some other factor. I conclude by describing the role of age in theories of justice of healthcare resource allocation
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Samuel J. Kerstein & Greg Bognar (2010). Complete Lives in the Balance. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):37 – 45.
Similar books and articles
Charles Upton (2001). The System of Antichrist: Truth & Falsehood in Postmodernism and the New Age. Sophia Perennis.
Raymond Martin (1972). On Weighting Causes. American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (4):291 - 299.
Germund Hesslow (1983). Explaining Differences and Weighting Causes. Theoria 49 (2):87-111.
Michael Hammond (1977). Weighting Causes in Historical Explanation. Theoria 43 (2):103-128.
David H. Lane (1996). The Phenomenon of Teilhard: Prophet for a New Age. Mercer University Press.
Sten Sparre Nilson (1979). Weighting of Historical Causes. Theoria 45 (1):40-43.
Agnesa Pillon & Dana Samson (2001). On Disentangling and Weighting Kinds of Semantic Knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):490-490.
Glenn Carruthers (2012). The Case for the Comparator Model as an Explanation of the Sense of Agency and its Breakdowns. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):30-45.
Marie Pfiffelmann (2011). Solving the St. Petersburg Paradox in Cumulative Prospect Theory: The Right Amount of Probability Weighting. Theory and Decision 71 (3):325-341.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #73,805 of 1,098,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #57,966 of 1,098,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?