David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Research Archives 12:387-448 (1986)
This paper offers a detailed account of arguments in De Caelo I by which Aristotle tried to demonstrate the necessity of the perpetual existence and the perpetual rotation of the cosmos. On our interpretation, Aristotle’s arguments are naturalistic. Instead of being based (as many have thought) on rules of logic and language, they depend, we argue, on natural science theories about abilities (δυνάμεις), e.g., to move and to change, which things have by nature and about the conditions under which these abilities can be exercised. Our interpretation locates the De Caelo arguments in the context of some central doctrines of the Organon, the Metaphysics, the Physics, and other texts. The De Caelo arguments fit a number of views developed in these texts. Aristotle’s treatments of local motion, of natural motion and change, of necessity and possibility, and of abilities and their exercises are examples. But, as we interpret them, the De Caelo arguments raise serious questions about the role of (and the need for) Metaphysics A’s soulful Unmoved Mover in Aristotle’s overall natural-scientific picture
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mohan Matthen (2009). Why Does Earth Move to the Center? An Examination of Some Explanatory Strategies in Aristotle's Cosmology. In Alan C. Bowen & Christian Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle's De Caelo. Brill 1--119.
Aristotle (1999). Aristotle: Physics, Book Viii. Clarendon Press.
Helen S. Lang (1998). The Order of Nature in Aristotle's Physics: Place and the Elements. Cambridge Unviersity Press.
James Longrigg (1968). Aristotle De Caelo Leo Elders: Aristotle's Cosmology: A Commentary on the 'De Caelo'. Pp. 370. Assen (Netherlands): Van Gorcum, 1966. Cloth, Fl. 32. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 18 (02):166-168.
Shane Duarte (2007). Aristotle's Theology and its Relation to the Science of Being Qua Being. Apeiron 40 (3):267-318.
Mariska Elisabeth Maria Philomena Johannes Leunissen, Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle's Philosophy of Nature.
Stephen Makin (1999). Aristotle's Two Modal Theses Again. Phronesis 44 (2):114 - 126.
Stephen Makin (1999). Aristotle's Two Modal Theses Again. Phronesis 44 (2):114-126.
Jeffrey D. Gower (2011). The King of the Cosmos. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):415-434.
Mariska Leunissen (forthcoming). Surrogate Principles and the Natural Order of Exposition in Aristotle’s De Caelo II. In R. Polansky & W. Wians (eds.), Reading Aristotle: Argument and Exposition in the Corpus Aristotelicum.
Sheldon M. Cohen (1996). Aristotle on Nature and Incomplete Substance. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Patterson (1995). Aristotle's Modal Logic: Essence and Entailment in the Organon. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads13 ( #179,414 of 1,700,305 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #105,649 of 1,700,305 )
How can I increase my downloads?