Graduate studies at Western
Deleuze Studies 5 (supplement):77-97 (2011)
|Abstract||When is the future? Is it to come or is it already here? This question serves as the frame for three further questions: why is utopia a bad concept and in what way is fabulation its superior counterpart? If the object of fabulation is the creation of a people to come, how do we get from the present to the future? And what is a people to come? The answers are (1) that the future is both now and to come, now as the becoming-revolutionary of our present and to come as the goal of our becoming; (2) utopia is a bad concept because it posits a pre-formed blueprint of the future, whereas a genuinely creative future has no predetermined shape and fabulation is the means whereby a creative future may be generated; (3) the movement from the revolutionary present toward a people to come proceeds via the protocol, which provides reference points for an experiment which exceeds our capacities to foresee; (4) a people to come is a collectivity that reconfigures group relations in a polity superior to the present, but it is not a utopian collectivity without differences, conflicts and political issues. Science fiction formulates protocols of the politics of a people to come, and Octavia Butler's science fiction is especially valuable in disclosing the relationship between fabulation and the invention of a people to come.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ori J. Herstein (2009). The Identity and (Legal) Rights of Future Generations. The George Washington Law Review 77:1173.
Peter Wenz (1983). Ethics, Energy Policy, and Future Generations. Environmental Ethics 5 (3):195-209.
Anja Kanngieser (2012). … And … and … and … The Transversal Politics of Performative Encounters. Deleuze Studies 6 (2):265-290.
Daniel Callahan (2000). Judging the Future: Whose Fault Will It Be? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):677 – 687.
Dan Moller (2006). Should We Let People Starve – for Now? Analysis 66 (291):240–247.
Philip Cafaro (2011). Taming Growth and Articulating a Sustainable Future The Way Forward for Environmental Ethics. Ethics and the Environment 16 (1):1-24.
Z. E. E. der & Inez de Beaufort (2011). Preconception Care: A Parenting Protocol. A Moral Inquiry Into the Responsibilities of Future Parents Towards Their Future Children. Bioethics 25 (8):451-457.
Elizabeth Harman (2004). Can We Harm and Benefit in Creating? Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):89–113.
Daniel Innerarity (2012). The Future and its Enemies: In Defense of Political Hope. Stanford University Press.
Kristian Skagen Ekeli (2004). Environmental Risks, Uncertainty and Intergenerational Ethics. Environmental Values 13 (4):421-448.
R. Routley & V. Routley (1978). Nuclear Energy and Obligations to the Future. Inquiry 21 (1-4):133 – 179.
Charles Tedder (2010). The Liberal Arts and Commensurability. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):80-92.
Added to index2011-11-24
Total downloads19 ( #71,234 of 722,949 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,949 )
How can I increase my downloads?