David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Deleuze Studies 5 (supplement):77-97 (2011)
When is the future? Is it to come or is it already here? This question serves as the frame for three further questions: why is utopia a bad concept and in what way is fabulation its superior counterpart? If the object of fabulation is the creation of a people to come, how do we get from the present to the future? And what is a people to come? The answers are (1) that the future is both now and to come, now as the becoming-revolutionary of our present and to come as the goal of our becoming; (2) utopia is a bad concept because it posits a pre-formed blueprint of the future, whereas a genuinely creative future has no predetermined shape and fabulation is the means whereby a creative future may be generated; (3) the movement from the revolutionary present toward a people to come proceeds via the protocol, which provides reference points for an experiment which exceeds our capacities to foresee; (4) a people to come is a collectivity that reconfigures group relations in a polity superior to the present, but it is not a utopian collectivity without differences, conflicts and political issues. Science fiction formulates protocols of the politics of a people to come, and Octavia Butler's science fiction is especially valuable in disclosing the relationship between fabulation and the invention of a people to come.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gilles Deleuze (1994). Difference and Repetition. Athlone Press.
Gilles Deleuze (1987/2002). Dialogues Ii. Columbia University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ori J. Herstein (2009). The Identity and (Legal) Rights of Future Generations. The George Washington Law Review 77:1173.
Peter Wenz (1983). Ethics, Energy Policy, and Future Generations. Environmental Ethics 5 (3):195-209.
Anja Kanngieser (2012). … And … and … and … The Transversal Politics of Performative Encounters. Deleuze Studies 6 (2):265-290.
Daniel Callahan (2000). Judging the Future: Whose Fault Will It Be? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):677 – 687.
Dan Moller (2006). Should We Let People Starve – for Now? Analysis 66 (291):240–247.
Philip Cafaro (2011). Taming Growth and Articulating a Sustainable Future The Way Forward for Environmental Ethics. Ethics and the Environment 16 (1):1-24.
Z. E. E. der & Inez de Beaufort (2011). Preconception Care: A Parenting Protocol. A Moral Inquiry Into the Responsibilities of Future Parents Towards Their Future Children. Bioethics 25 (8):451-457.
Elizabeth Harman (2004). Can We Harm and Benefit in Creating? Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):89–113.
Daniel Innerarity (2012). The Future and its Enemies: In Defense of Political Hope. Stanford University Press.
Kristian Skagen Ekeli (2004). Environmental Risks, Uncertainty and Intergenerational Ethics. Environmental Values 13 (4):421-448.
R. Routley & V. Routley (1978). Nuclear Energy and Obligations to the Future. Inquiry 21 (1-4):133 – 179.
Charles Tedder (2010). The Liberal Arts and Commensurability. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (2):80-92.
Gustaf Arrhenius (2009). Egalitarianism and Population Change. In Axel Gosseries & Lukas H. Meyer (eds.), Intergenerational Justice. Oup Oxford.
Added to index2011-11-24
Total downloads20 ( #79,714 of 1,096,179 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #218,857 of 1,096,179 )
How can I increase my downloads?