In Steven Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Blackwell (2011)
|Abstract||The paper looks at three big ideas that have been associated with the term “relativism.” The first maintains that some property has a higher-degree than might have been thought. The second that the judgments in a particular domain of discourse are capable only of relative truth and not of absolute truth (an idea that is sometimes associated with the idea of “faultless disagreement.”) And the third, which I dub with the oxymoronic label “absolutist relativism,” seeks to locate relativism in our acceptance of certain sorts of spare absolutist principles. The first idea is well illustrated by the famous cases drawn from physics, but is ill suited for providing a model for the sorts of relativism about normative domains that have most interested philosophers. The second idea – according to which it is the truth of certain judgments that is relative – seems subject to a very difficult dilemma. The final idea provides a coherent model of cases like etiquette but is not plausibly applied to the moral or epistemic domains.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ram Neta (2007). In Defense of Epistemic Relativism. Episteme 4 (1):30-48.
H. G. Callaway (2009). Fear of Knowledge, Against Relativism and Constructivism – by Paul Artin Boghossian. Dialectica 63 (3):357-360.
John F. Fox (1994). How Must Relativism Be Construed to Be Coherent? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (1):55-75.
James Dreier (2009). Relativism (and Expressivism) and the Problem of Disagreement. Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):79-110.
Michael Glanzberg (2007). Context, Content, and Relativism. Philosophical Studies 136 (1):1--29.
Steven D. Hales (ed.) (2011). A Companion to Relativism. Wiley-Blackwell.
Denis Robinson (2004). Failing to Agree or Failing to Disagree?: Personal Identity Quasi-Relativism. The Monist 87 (4):512-36.
Mark Kalderon (2009). Epistemic Relativism. Philosophical Review 118 (2):225-240.
Maria Baghramian (2004). Relativism. Routledge.
Howard Sankey (2012). Scepticism, Relativism and the Argument From the Criterion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):182-190.
John J. Tilley (1995). Two Kinds of Moral Relativism. Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (2):187-192.
Mohammad A. Shomali (2001). Ethical Relativism: An Analysis of the Foundations of Morality. Distributed by Saqi Books.
Aaron Z. Zimmerman (2007). Against Relativism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 133 (3):313-348.
Howard Darmstadter (2007). Relativism and Progress. Reason Papers (29):41-57.
Added to index2011-06-05
Total downloads235 ( #1,141 of 722,873 )
Recent downloads (6 months)57 ( #905 of 722,873 )
How can I increase my downloads?