Graduate studies at Western
In Patrick Greenough & Michael Lynch (eds.), Truth and Relativism. Clarendon Press (2006)
|Abstract||Many philosophers, however, have been tempted to be relativists about speciﬁc domains of discourse, especially about those domains that have a normative character. Gilbert Harman, for example, has defended a relativistic view of morality, Richard Rorty a relativistic view of epistemic justiﬁcation, and Crispin Wright a relativistic view of judgments of taste.¹ But what exactly is it to be a relativist about a given domain of discourse?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William Max Knorpp Jr (1998). What Relativism Isn't. Philosophy 73 (284):277 - 300.
Christian Miller (2002). Rorty and Moral Relativism. European Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):354–374.
James Beebe (2010). Moral Relativism in Context. Noûs 44 (4):691-724.
Byron L. Haines (1993). A Critique of Harman's Empiric Relativism. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:97-107.
Duncan Pritchard (2009). Defusing Epistemic Relativism. Synthese 166 (2):397 - 412.
Charles Sayward (1988). System Relativism. Ratio 1 (2):163-175.
Gideon Rosen (2007). The Case Against Epistemic Relativism: Reflections on Chapter 6 of Fear of Knowledge. Episteme 4 (1):10-29.
Paul Artin Boghossian (2007). The Case Against Epistemic Relativism: Replies to Rosen and Neta. Episteme 4 (1):49-65.
B. Richard Beatch (1996). The Radical Nature of Margolis' Relativism. Journal of Philosophical Research 21:81-93.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads220 ( #1,335 of 739,315 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,077 of 739,315 )
How can I increase my downloads?