David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 3 (2 & 3):271 – 286 (1990)
The relationship of mind and matter is approached in a new way in this article. This approach is based on the causal interpretation of the quantum theory, in which an electron, for example, is regarded as an inseparable union of a particle and afield. This field has, however, some new properties that can be seen to be the main sources of the differences between the quantum theory and the classical (Newtonian) theory. These new properties suggest that the field may be regarded as containing objective and active information, and that the activity of this information is similar in certain key ways to the activity of information in our ordinary subjective experience. The analogy between mind and matter is thus fairly close. This analogy leads to the proposal of the general outlines of a new theory of mind, matter, and their relationship, in which the basic notion is participation rather than interaction. Although the theory can be developed mathematically in more detail, the main emphasis here is to show qualitatively how it provides a way of thinking that does not divide mind from matter, and thus leads to a more coherent understanding of such questions than is possible in the common dualistic and reductionistic approaches. These ideas may be relevant to connectionist theories and might perhaps suggest new directions for their development.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
D. J. Bohm & B. J. Hiley (1975). On the Intuitive Understanding of Nonlocality as Implied by Quantum Theory. Foundations of Physics 5 (1):93-109.
David Bohm (1957/1999). Causality and Chance in Modern Physics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
John Cottingham (ed.) (1998). Descartes. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Brian D. Josephson & Fotini Pallikari-Viras (1991). Biological Utilization of Quantum Nonlocality. Foundations of Physics 21 (2):197-207.
Antonio Chella & Riccardo Manzotti (2009). Machine Consciousness: A Manifesto for Robotics. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 1 (01):33-51.
Similar books and articles
David Bakan (1980). On Effect of Mind on Matter. In Body & Mind: Past, Present And Future. New York: Academic Press.
N. Sieroka (2010). Geometrization Versus Transcendent Matter: A Systematic Historiography of Theories of Matter Following Weyl. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (4):769-802.
Basil J. Hiley & Paavo Pylkkanen (2005). Can Mind Affect Matter Via Active Information? Mind and Matter 3 (2):8-27.
Henry P. Stapp (2001). Quantum Theory and the Role of Mind in Nature. Foundations of Physics 31 (10):1465-1499.
Jay McDaniel (1983). Physical Matter as Creative and Sentient. Environmental Ethics 5 (4):291-317.
Paavo Pylkkänen (2010). Implications of Bohmian Quantum Ontology for Psychopathology. Neuroquantology 8 (1):37-48.
David J. Bohm (1986). A New Theory of the Relationship of Mind and Matter. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 80 (2 & 3):113-35.
Added to index2009-03-08
Total downloads55 ( #27,145 of 1,096,564 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #50,170 of 1,096,564 )
How can I increase my downloads?