Commentary on “technology and civil disobedience: Why engineers have a special duty to obey the law”
Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (2) (1995)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRichard Dagger (2007). Christopher Heath Wellman and A. John Simmons, Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?:Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? Ethics 118 (1):184-188.
William A. Edmundson (1998). Legitimate Authority Without Political Obligation. Law and Philosophy 17 (1):43 - 60.
Brian J. Huschle (2002). Cyber Disobedience. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):69-83.
Fred R. Berger (1970). 'Law and Order' and Civil Disobedience. Inquiry 13 (1-4):254 – 273.
Michael Martin (1990). Ecosabotage and Civil Disobedience. Environmental Ethics 12 (4):291-310.
Chaim Gans (1992). Philosophical Anarchism and Political Disobedience. Cambridge University Press.
Eugene Schlossberger (1995). Technology and Civil Disobedience: Why Engineers Have a Special Duty to Obey the Law. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (2).
Vinit Haksar (1976). Rawls and Gandhi on Civil Disobedience. Inquiry 19 (1-4):151 – 192.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #107,683 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
