Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 8 (4):217 - 230 (1989)
|Abstract||This case study focuses on Roger Boisjoly's attempt to prevent the launch of the Challenger and subsequent quest to set the record straight despite negative consequences. Boisjoly's experiences before and after the Challenger disaster raise numerous ethical issues that are integral to any explanation of the disaster and applicable to other management situations. Underlying all these issues, however, is the problematic relationship between individual and organizational responsibility. In analyzing this fundamental issue, this paper has two objectives: first, to demonstrate the extent to which the ethical ambiguity that permeates the relationship between individual and organizational responsibility contributed to the Challenger disaster; second, to reclaim the meaning and importance of individual responsibility within the diluting context of large organizations.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roger M. Boisjoly (1995). Commentary on “Technology and Civil Disobedience: Why Engineers Have a Special Duty to Obey the Law”. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (2):169-171.
Leonard Kahn (2013). Rule Consequentialism and Disasters. Philosophical Studies 162 (2):219-236.
Roger M. Boisjoly (1998). Applications to the Industrial Sector. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):71-74.
Michael Davis (1997). Better Communication Between Engineers and Managers. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):171-212.
Stephen David Ross (2010). Disaster. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:335-350.
Mark Maier (1997). Gender Equity, Organizational Transformation and Challenger. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (9):943-962.
Junichi Murata (2006). From Challenger to Columbia. Techné 10 (1):30-44.
Patricia H. Werhane (1991). Engineers and Management: The Challenge of the Challenger Incident. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (8):605 - 616.
Andrew Feenberg (2006). Symmetry, Asymmetry, and the Real Possibility of Radical Change: Reply to Kochan. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37 (4):721-727.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads53 ( #23,400 of 757,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #38,592 of 757,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?