Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 180 (1):33 - 45 (2011)
|Abstract||Scientific models invariably involve some degree of idealization, abstraction, or nationalization of their target system. Nonetheless, I argue that there are circumstances under which such false models can offer genuine scientific explanations. After reviewing three different proposals in the literature for how models can explain, I shall introduce a more general account of what I call model explanations, which specify the conditions under which models can be counted as explanatory. I shall illustrate this new framework by applying it to the case of Bohr's model of the atom, and conclude by drawing some distinctions between phenomenological models, explanatory models, and fictional models|
|Keywords||Models Explanation Fictions Structural explanation Bohr’s atom|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Roman Frigg (2008). Models in Science. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Steven Rappaport (1995). Economic Models and Historical Explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (4):421-441.
Roman Frigg & Stephan Hartmann (2005). Scientific Models. In Sahotra Sarkar et al (ed.), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia, Vol. 2. Routledge.
Stephan Hartmann & Roman Frigg (2006). Models in Science. In Ed Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford.
Gabriele Contessa (2010). Scientific Models and Fictional Objects. Synthese 172 (2):215 - 229.
Carl F. Craver (2006). When Mechanistic Models Explain. Synthese 153 (3):355-376.
S. Ducheyne (2008). Towards an Ontology of Scientific Models. Metaphysica 9 (1):119-127.
Added to index2009-05-18
Total downloads189 ( #1,960 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,054 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?