Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):195-195 (1998)
|Abstract||Although various statistical measures may have other valid uses, the single purpose served by statistical significance testing in the epistemology of experimental science is as a peremptory rebuttal of one potential alternative interpretation of the data.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tom Engsted (2009). Statistical Vs. Economic Significance in Economics and Econometrics: Further Comments on McCloskey and Ziliak. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (4):393-408.
Günther Palm (1998). Significance Testing – Does It Need This Defence? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):214-215.
Michael G. Shafto (1998). Costs and Benefits of Statistical Significance Tests. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.
Helena Chmura Kraemer (1998). Statistical Significance: A Statistician's View. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):206-207.
David Sohn (2000). Does the Finding of Statistical Significance Justify the Rejection of the Null Hypothesis? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):293-294.
John R. Vokey (1998). Statistics Without Probability: Significance Testing as Typicality and Exchangeability in Data Analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):225-226.
Kevin D. Hoover & Mark V. Siegler (2008). Sound and Fury: McCloskey and Significance Testing in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (1):1-37.
Thomas Bartz-Beielstein (2008). How Experimental Algorithmics Can Benefit From Mayo's Extensions to Neyman–Pearson Theory of Testing. Synthese 163 (3):385 - 396.
Jacques Poitevineau & Bruno Lecoutre (1998). Some Statistical Misconceptions in Chow's Statistical Significance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):215-215.
Kent W. Staley (1999). Golden Events and Statistics: What's Wrong with Galison's Image/Logic Distinction? Perspectives on Science 7 (2):196-230.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #160,368 of 549,080 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?