Perspectives on Science 16 (1):103-114 (2008)
|Abstract||: Although Dirac rarely participated in the interpretational debates over quantum theory, it is traditionally assumed that his views were aligned with Heisenberg and Bohr in the so-called Copenhagen-Göttingen camp. However, an unpublished—and apparently unknown—lecture of Dirac's reveals that this view is mistaken; in the famous debate between Einstein and Bohr, Dirac sided with Einstein. Surprisingly, Dirac believed that quantum mechanics was not complete, that the uncertainty principle would not survive in the future physics, and that a deterministic description of the microworld would be recovered. In this paper I show how we can make sense of this unpublished lecture in the context of Dirac's broader philosophy of quantum mechanics, and how our present understanding of Dirac's philosophical views must be revised.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Otavio Bueno (2005). Dirac and the Dispensability of Mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 36 (3):465-490.
Manjit Kumar (2009). Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate About the Nature of Reality. Hachette India.
Kristian Camilleri (2009). Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation. Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57.
Nicolaas P. Landsman (2006). When Champions Meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein Debate. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (1):212-242.
Han Geurdes, On an Intrinsic Quantum Theoretical Structure Inside Einstein's Gravity Field Equations.
Alisa Bokulich (2004). Open or Closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the Relation Between Classical and Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (3):377-396.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #33,057 of 549,252 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,790 of 549,252 )
How can I increase my downloads?