|Abstract||In what follows I have merely tried to state, one by one, some of the most important points in which my philosophical position differs from positions which have been taken up by some other philosophers. It may be that the points which I have had room to mention are not really the most important, and possibly some of them may be points as to which no philosopher has ever really differed from me. But, to the best of my belief, each is a point as to which many have really differed; although (in most cases, at all events) each is also a point as to which many have agreed with me|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Michael Pakaluk (2002). A Defence of Scottish Common Sense. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):564-581.
Erik Lundestad (2008). The Necessity of Pragmatism: Overcoming the Stalemate of Common Sense. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):175-187.
John Kekes (1979). A New Defence of Common Sense. American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):115 - 122.
Brian Grant (2001). The Virtues of Common Sense. Philosophy 76 (2):191-209.
Uriah Kriegel (2011). Two Defenses of Common-Sense Ontology. Dialectica 65 (2):177-204.
Ruth Weintraub (2001). Logical Knowledge. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (1):3 – 18.
David Thomas (1978). Sociology and Common Sense. Inquiry 21 (1-4):1 – 32.
Michael De Medeiros (2010). Common Sense. Weigl Publishers.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #43,378 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?