David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:1--30 (1956)
The subject of this paper, Excuses, is one not to be treated, but only to be introduced, within such limits. It is, or might be, the name of a whole branch, even a ramiculated branch, of philosophy, or at least of one fashion of philosophy. I shall try, therefore, first to state what the subject is, why it is worth studying, and how it may be studied, all this at a regrettably lofty level: and then I shall illustrate, in more congenial but desultory detail, some of the methods to be used, together with their limitations, and some of the unexpected results to be expected and lessons to be learned. Much, of course, of the amusement, and of the instruction, comes in drawing the coverts of the microglot, in hounding down the minutiae, and to this I can do no more here than incite you. But I owe it to the subject to say, that it has long afforded me what philosophy is so often thought, and made, barren of -- the fun of discovery, the pleasures of co-operation, and the satisfaction of reaching agreement
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Timothy Williamson (2013). Response to Cohen, Comesaña, Goodman, Nagel, and Weatherson on Gettier Cases in Epistemic Logic. Inquiry 56 (1):77-96.
Andrew Botterell (2009). A Primer on the Distinction Between Justification and Excuse. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):172-196.
Jim Bogen (2008). Causally Productive Activities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):112-123.
Espen Dahl (2011). On Morality of Speech: Cavell's Critique of Derrida. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 44 (1):81-101.
Friderik Klampfer (2004). Moral Responsibility for Unprevented Harm. Acta Analytica 19 (33):119-161.
Similar books and articles
Marcia Baron (2006). Excuses, Excuses. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):21-39.
Jeremy Horder (2007). Excuses in Law and in Morality: A Response to Marcia Baron. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):41-47.
Jennifer Radden (1982). Diseases as Excuses: Durham and the Insanity Plea. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 42 (3):349 - 362.
Michael J. Zimmerman (2004). Another Plea for Excuses. American Philosophical Quarterly 41 (3):259 - 266.
R. A. Duff (2006). Excuses, Moral and Legal: A Comment on Marcia Baron's 'Excuses, Excuses'. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):49-55.
David Holdcroft (1969). A Plea for Excuses? Philosophy 44 (170):314 - 330.
J. L. Austin (1956). A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:1 - 30.
J. L. Austin (1964). A Plea for Excuses. In V. C. Chappell (ed.), Ordinary Language: Essays in Philosophical Method. Dover Publications 1--30.
Robert Franck & J. -L. Austin (1967). Les Excuses (« A Plea for Excuses »). Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 72 (4):414 - 445.
Christopher Evan Franklin (2013). A Theory of the Normative Force of Pleas. Philosophical Studies 163 (2):479-502.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads297 ( #2,612 of 1,724,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #44,229 of 1,724,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?