David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Techne 13 (1):1-12 (2009)
Since the 1930’s, several attempts have been made to develop a general theory of technical systems or objects and their evolution: in France, Jacques Lafitte, André Leroi-Gourhan, Bertrand Gille, Yves Deforge, and Gilbert Simondon are the main representatives of this trend. In this paper, we focus on the work of Simondon: his analysis of technical progress is based on the hypothesis that technology has its own laws and that customer demand has no paramount influence upon the evolution of technical systems. We first describe the process Simondon called “concretization” and compare it with the process of “idealization” as defined by Genrich Altshuller. We then explain how the progress of technical lineages can be characterized as following a specific rhythm of relaxation and how it thus obeys a “law” of evolution in the industrial context. Simondon’s theoretical approach, although similar to some aspects of methodologies of conception, emphasized a more accurate understanding of technical progress over possible operational applications. Simondon never intended to optimize the engineer’s tasks from an economic point of view and, in fact, his conception of technical progress can be considered as independent from the capitalistic trend of innovation. However, the philosophy of Simondon provides a better understanding of what is at stake theoretically in the modeling of laws of technical evolution
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Dumouchel (1992). Gilbert Simondon's Plea for a Philosophy of Technology. Inquiry 35 (3 & 4):407 – 421.
Gilbert Simondon (2011). On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Deleuze Studies 5 (3):407-424.
Marc J. de Vries (2008). Gilbert Simondon and the Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts. Techne 12 (1):23-35.
Miguel Quintanilla (1998). Técnica y cultura. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):49-69.
Arne De Boever (ed.) (2012). Gilbert Simondon: Being and Technology. Edinburgh University Press.
Adrian Mackenzie (2005). Problematising the Technological: The Object as Event? Social Epistemology 19 (4):381 – 399.
Gilbert Simondon (2005). Historie de la Notion d'Individu. Chiasmi International 7:45-54.
Gilbert Simondon (2005). Riassunto: Storia della nozione d'individuo. Chiasmi International 7:65-74.
Gilbert Simondon & David Gougelet (2005). Abstract: A History of the Notion of the Individual. Chiasmi International 7:55-64.
Timothy Shanahan (2004). The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation, and Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge University Press.
I. Frederik, W. Sonneveld & M. J. de Vries, Teaching and Learning the Nature of Technical Artifacts.
Bernard Stiegler (1998). Technics and Time. Stanford University Press.
Andrew Feenberg (1992). Subversive Rationalization: Technology, Power, and Democracy. Inquiry 35 (3 & 4):301 – 322.
Anne Lefebvre (2011). The Individuation of Nature in Gilbert Simondon's Philosophy and the Problematic Nature of the Technological Object. Techne 15 (1):1-15.
Dan Lyons (1979). Are Luddites Confused? Inquiry 22 (1-4):381 – 403.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads25 ( #147,105 of 1,790,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #264,810 of 1,790,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?