Modal logic and game theory: Two alternative approaches
Risk Decision and Policy 7:309-324 (2002)
| Abstract | Two views of game theory are discussed: (1) game theory as a description of the behavior of rational individuals who recognize each other’s rationality and reasoning abilities, and (2) game theory as an internally consistent recommendation to individuals on how to act in interactive situations. It is shown that the same mathematical tool, namely modal logic, can be used to explicitly model both views. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Boudewijn de Bruin (2008). Reducible and Nonsensical Uses of Game Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (2):247-266.
Boudewijn De Bruin (2005). Game Theory in Philosophy. Topoi 24 (2):197-208.
Dietmar Berwanger (2003). Game Logic is Strong Enough for Parity Games. Studia Logica 75 (2):205 - 219.
Lauri Carlson (1994). Logic for Dialogue Games. Synthese 99 (3):377 - 415.
Patrick Blackburn, J. F. A. K. van Benthem & Frank Wolter (eds.) (2007). Handbook of Modal Logic. Elsevier.
Robert C. Robinson (2006). Bounded Epistemology. Ssrn Elibrary.
Marc Pauly & Rohit Parikh (2003). Game Logic - an Overview. Studia Logica 75 (2):165 - 182.
Valentin Goranko (2003). The Basic Algebra of Game Equivalences. Studia Logica 75 (2):221 - 238.
Boudewijn de Bruin (2005). Game Theory in Philosophy. Topoi 24 (2):197-208.
Till Grüne‐Yanoff & Paul Schweinzer (2008). The Roles of Stories in Applying Game Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (2):131-146.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads32 ( #37,960 of 549,117 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,117 )How can I increase my downloads? |

