David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minerva 48 (4):355-387 (2010)
New sciences born or developed in the 20th century (information, materials, life science) are based on forms of complementarity that differ from the past. The paper discusses cognitive, or disciplinary, institutional, and technical complementarity. It argues that new sciences apply a reductionist explanatory strategy to complex multi-layered systems. In doing so the reductionist promise is falsified, generating the need for multi-level kinds of explanation (e.g. in post-genomic molecular biology), new forms of complementarity between scientific and non-scientific organizations, and new forms of experimental and informational facilities. The paper develops the argument in theoretical terms, comparing it with the STS literature, and offers preliminary evidence based on the experience of Networks of Excellence
|Keywords||Dynamics of science Reductionism Search regimes Inter-disciplinarity Non-scientific institutions Complementarity|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Barry Barnes & David O. Edge (eds.) (1982). Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science. Mit Press.
Andrea Bonaccorsi (2008). Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science. Minerva 46 (3):285-315.
Massimiano Bucchi (1997). The Public Science of Louis Pasteur: The Experiment on Anthrax Vaccine in the Popular Press of the Time. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 19 (2):181 - 209.
Michel Callon & Bruno Latour (1992). Don't Throw the Baby Out with the Bath School! A Reply to Collins and Yearley. In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press. 343--368.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Danuta Sobczyńska (1996). Idea komplementarności ekspertymentów. Filozofia Nauki 2.
K. Sundaram (1972). Kant or Cassirer: A Study in Complementarity. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 3 (1):40-48.
Sahotra Sarkar & James Justus, The Principle of Complementarity in the Design of Reserve Networks to Conserve Biodiversity: A Preliminary History.
Hans Jonas (1986). Parallelism and Complementarity. In Marjorie G. Grene & Debra Nails (eds.), Spinoza and the Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Caterina Marchionni (2008). Explanatory Pluralism and Complementarity: From Autonomy to Integration. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):314-333.
Henry J. Folse (1985). The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity. Sole Distributors for the U.S.A. And Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Paul Busch & Christopher Shilladay, Complementarity and Uncertainty in Mach-Zehnder Interferometry and Beyond.
Piotr Bylica (2006). Komplementarność nauki i religii. Filozofia Nauki 1.
T. Acton, S. Caffrey, S. Dunn, P. Vinson & K. Svozil (1998). Analogues of Quantum Complementarity in the Theory of Automata - a Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 29 (1):61-80.
Henk W. de Regt (2006). Wesley Salmon's Complementarity Thesis: Causalism and Unificationism Reconciled? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):129 – 147.
Henry J. Folse Jr (1993). The Environment and the Epistemological Lesson of Complementarity. Environmental Ethics 15 (4):345-353.
Julian Kiverstein & Mirko Farina (2011). Embraining Culture: Leaky Minds and Spongy Brains. Teorema - Special Issue Dedicated to the Extended Mind.
Douglas M. Snyder (1988). On Complementarity and Causal Isomorphism. Journal of Mind and Behavior 9:1-4.
Added to index2010-12-04
Total downloads16 ( #103,997 of 1,102,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #182,643 of 1,102,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?