Graduate studies at Western
Erkenntnis 76 (2):279-298 (2012)
|Abstract||Two problems related to the biological identity of living beings are faced: the who-problem (which are the biological properties making that living being unique and different from the others?); the persistence-problem (what does it take for a living being to persist from a time to another?). They are discussed inside a molecular biology framework, which shows how epigenetics can be a good ground to provide plausible answers. That is, we propose an empirical solution to the who-problem and to the persistence-problem on the basis of the new perspectives opened by a molecular understanding of epigenetic processes. In particular, concerning the former, we argue that any living being is the result of the epigenetic processes that have regulated the expression of its genome; concerning the latter, we defend the idea that the criterion for the persistence of its identity is to be indicated in the continuity of those epigenetic processes. We also counteract possible objections, in particular (1) whether our approach has something to say at a metaphysical level; (2) how it could account for the passage from the two phenotypes of the parental gametes to the single phenotype of the zygote; (3) how it could account for the identity of derivatives of one living being that continue to live disjoined from that original living being; (4) how it could account for higher mental functions|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Boris Hennig (2007). Der Fortbestand Von Lebewesen. Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 32 (1):81-91.
Jack Wilson (1999). Biological Individuality: The Identity and Persistence of Living Entities. Cambridge University Press.
James P. Sterba (2005). Global Justice for Humans or for All Living Beings and What Difference It Makes. Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):283 - 300.
James Kreines (2008). The Logic of Life: Hegel's Philosophical Defense of Teleological Explanation of Living Beings. In James Kreines (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge Univ Pr.
David Hershenov (2005). Do Dead Bodies Pose a Problem for Biological Approaches to Personal Identity? Mind 114 (453):31 - 59.
David B. Hershenov (2009). Organisms and Their Bodies: Response to LaPorte. Mind 118 (471):803-809.
Christopher V. Mirus (2012). Aristotle on Beauty and Goodness in Nature. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (1):79-97.
Enrique Romerales (2007). Persistence, Ontic Vagueness and Identity: Towards a Substantialist Four–Dimensionalism. [REVIEW] Metaphysica 9 (1):33-55.
Antoine Danchin (2003). The Delphic Boat. What Genomes Tell Us. Harvard University Press.
Aurel I. Popescu (1998). Bionics, Biological Systems and the Principle of Optimal Design. Acta Biotheoretica 46 (4).
L. Dennis, R. W. Gray, L. H. Kauffman, J. Brender McNair & N. J. Woolf (2009). A Framework Linking Non-Living and Living Systems: Classification of Persistence, Survival and Evolution Transitions. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 14 (3):217-238.
Bernard Korzeniewski (2005). Confrontation of the Cybernetic Definition of a Living Individual with the Real World. Acta Biotheoretica 53 (1).
Christophe Malaterre (2010). Lifeness Signatures and the Roots of the Tree of Life. Biology and Philosophy 25 (4):643-658.
David Morris (2005). What is Living and What is Non-Living in Merleau-Ponty's Philosophy of Movement and Expression. Chiasmi International 7:225-238.
Added to index2011-07-14
Total downloads28 ( #49,908 of 739,354 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,423 of 739,354 )
How can I increase my downloads?