David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1983)
This is a ground-breaking study of the consequences of a central problem in Aristotle's Metaphysics in the interpretation given to it by Islamic and Christian Aristotelian philosophers: the relationship between individuals as individuals, and individuals as instances of a universal. Father Booth begins from an examination of the factors causing the aporia in the centre of Aristotle's ontology, going on to elaborate the way in which it occurred sometimes with confused reactions among the Greek, Syrian and Arab commentators, and to note in particular the modifications to the weighting of elements in Aristotle's ontological figures (differing in detail, but in tendency the same) when his ontology was brought into the union with Platonist and other thought conventionally known as `Neoplatonism'. The discussion culminates in two chapters on the different reconciliations of the radical Aristotelian and the Neoplatonist traditions, proposed by Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas, in which the factors in the aporia have a key importance.
|Keywords||Philosophy, Medieval Ontology History|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$35.16 used (54% off) $47.20 new (15% off) $54.99 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B491.O5.B65 1983|
|ISBN(s)||0521252547 052109044X 9780521252546|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dana S. Belu & Andrew Feenberg (2010). Heidegger's Aporetic Ontology of Technology. Inquiry 53 (1):1-19.
Joseph Owens (1978). The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics: A Study in the Greek Background of Mediaeval Thought. Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Joep Lameer (1994). Al-Fārābī and Aristotelian Syllogistics: Greek Theory and Islamic Practice. E.J. Brill.
John Inglis (ed.) (2003). Medieval Philosophy and the Classical Tradition in Islam, Judaism, and Christianity. Routledgecurzon.
Daniel von Wachter (2007). God as Substance Without Substance Ontology. In Christian Kanzian & Muhammed Legenhausen (eds.), Substance and Attribute: Western and Islamic Traditions in Dialogue.
Roberta de Monticelli (2003). On Ontology. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):171-186.
David B. Burrell (1986). Aristotelian Aporetic Ontology in Islamic and Christian Writers. New Scholasticism 60 (2):243-245.
L. V. Berman (1987). Aristotelian Aporetic Ontology in Islamic and Christian Thinkers. Ancient Philosophy 7:241-242.
Curtis L. Hancock (1987). Aristotelian Aporetic Ontology in Islamic and Christian Thinkers. Journal of the History of Philosophy 25 (4):587-589.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #201,792 of 1,700,408 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,408 )
How can I increase my downloads?