Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):187–198 (1997)
|Abstract||R.M. Hare and Harry J. Gensler have each argued that abortion can be shown to be immoral by appealing to a version of the golden rule. I argue that both versions of the golden rule argument against abortion should be rejected: each rests on a version of the golden rule which is objectionable on independent grounds, each is unable to support its conclusion when the rule is satisfactorily modified, and each is unable to avoid the implication that contraception is as wrong as abortion and for the same reason. In addition, some further problems particular to each position are identified|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Andrew J. Peach (2005). A Natural Response to Boonin. International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):357-376.
Samuel V. Bruton (2004). Teaching the Golden Rule. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (2):179-187.
Jeffrey Wattles (1987). Levels of Meaning in the Golden Rule. Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (1):106 - 129.
Jacob Neusner (ed.) (2009). The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions. Continuum.
Yong Huang (2005). A Copper Rule Versus the Golden Rule: A Daoist-Confucian Proposal for Global Ethics. Philosophy East and West 55 (3):394-425.
Keith D. Stanglin (2005). The Historical Connection Between the Golden Rule and the Second Greatest Love Command. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):357-371.
Chris D. Meyers (2005). Abortion, the Golden Rule, and the Indeterminacy of Potential Persons. Journal of Value Inquiry 39 (3-4):541.
R. M. Hare (1975). Abortion and the Golden Rule. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (3):201-222.
George Sher (1977). Hare, Abortion, and the Golden Rule. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (2):185-190.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #28,948 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?