David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Science 13 (2):127-142 (2008)
This paper is concerned with scientific reasoning in the engineering sciences. Engineering sciences aim at explaining, predicting and describing physical phenomena occurring in technological devices. The focus of this paper is on mathematical description. These mathematical descriptions are important to computer-aided engineering or design programs (CAE and CAD). The first part of this paper explains why a traditional view, according to which scientific laws explain and predict phenomena and processes, is problematic. In the second part, the reasons of these methodological difficulties are analyzed. Ludwig Prandtl’s method of integrating a theoretical and empirical approach is used as an example of good scientific practice. Based on this analysis, a distinction is made between different types of laws that play a role in constructing mathematical descriptions of phenomena. A central assumption in understanding research methodology is that, instead of scientific laws, knowledge of capacities and mechanisms are primary in the engineering sciences. Another important aspect in methodology of the engineering sciences is that in explaining a phenomenon or process spatial regions are distinguished in which distinct physical behaviour occur. The mechanisms in distinct spatial regions are represented in a so-called diagrammatic model. The construction of a mathematical description of the phenomenon or process is based on this diagrammatic model.
|Keywords||Engineering science Diagrammatic models Methodology Prandtl Mathematical modelling Scientific practice Experiments|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mieke Boon (2011). Two Styles of Reasoning in Scientific Practices: Experimental and Mathematical Traditions. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):255 - 278.
Kathrin Friedrich (2013). Digital 'Faces' of Synthetic Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (2):217-224.
Similar books and articles
Nancy J. Nersessian (2006). Model-Based Reasoning in Distributed Cognitive Systems. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):699-709.
Jean-Pierre Marquis (1999). Mathematical Engineering and Mathematical Change. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (3):245 – 259.
Mieke Boon (2011). In Defense of Engineering Sciences. Techné 15 (1):49-71.
Yakov Ben-Haim (1994). Convex Models of Uncertainty: Applications and Implications. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 41 (2):139 - 156.
Susan G. Sterrett (2006). Models of Machines and Models of Phenomena. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):69 – 80.
Thomas Hänseroth & Klaus Mauersberger (1998). Technikwissenschaften zwischen theoretischer Erkenntnis und Ingenieurtätigkeit. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 6 (1):217-237.
Colleen Murphy, Paolo Gardoni & Charles Harris (2011). Classification and Moral Evaluation of Uncertainties in Engineering Modeling. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):553-570.
Mieke Boon, How Science is Applied in Technology: Explaining Basic Sciences in the Engineering Sciences.
Mieke Boon (2006). How Science is Applied in Technology. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):27 – 47.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #138,576 of 1,096,454 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #238,630 of 1,096,454 )
How can I increase my downloads?