Social Acceptance of Dairy Farming: The Ambivalence Between the Two Faces of Modernity [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (3):259-282 (2011)
Society’s relationship with modern animal farming is an ambivalent one: on the one hand there is rising criticism about modern animal farming; on the other hand people appreciate certain aspects of it, such as increased food safety and low food prices. This ambivalence reflects the two faces of modernity: the negative (exploitation of nature and loss of traditions) and the positive (progress, convenience, and efficiency). This article draws on a national survey carried out in the Netherlands that aimed at gaining a deeper understanding about the acceptance of modern dairy farming in Dutch society. People take two dimensions into account when evaluating different aspects of modern dairy farming: (1) the way living beings are used for production and (2) the way a dairy farm functions as a business. In both these dimensions people appeared to adopt cautious opinions: most people preferred relatively traditional and natural farms and were concerned about the use of nature and treatment of animals in modern production—although this did not imply an outright rejection of modern animal farming. The study also looked for (and sought to explain) differences of opinion between social groups. Besides socio-demographic factors such as age and gender, farming experience and value-orientation (such as socially minded and professional) appeared to be important variables. The values and convictions within modern society can help to explain why some people are greatly concerned about animal welfare while some show less concern. This diversity also helps to explain why general information campaigns are quite ineffective in allaying concerns about modern animal farming
|Keywords||Society Citizens Public Values Animal farming|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe & Erik Steen Kristensen (2002). Towards a Systemic Research Methodology in Agriculture: Rethinking the Role of Values in Science. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 19 (1):3-23.
Karijn Bonne & Wim Verbeke (2008). Religious Values Informing Halal Meat Production and the Control and Delivery of Halal Credence Quality. Agriculture and Human Values 25 (1):35-47.
Egbert Kanis, Ab F. Groen & Karel H. De Greef (2003). Societal Concerns About PORK and PORK Production and Their Relationships to the Production System. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (2):137-162.
Phil Macnaghten, Animals in Their Nature: A Case Study of Public Attitudes on Animals, Genetic Modification and 'Nature'.
Frank W. Oudshoorn, Reint Jan Renes & Imke J. M. De Boer (2008). Systems in Organic Dairy Production. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (3):205-228.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
K. Boogaard Birgit, B. Bock Bettina, J. Oosting Simon, S. C. Wiskerke Johannes & J. der Zijpp Akkvane (forthcoming). Social Acceptance of Dairy Farming: The Ambivalence Between the Two Faces of Modernity. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.
M. R. N. Bruijnis, F. L. B. Meijboom & E. N. Stassen (2013). Longevity as an Animal Welfare Issue Applied to the Case of Foot Disorders in Dairy Cattle. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):191-205.
Adam Shriver (2009). Knocking Out Pain in Livestock: Can Technology Succeed Where Morality has Stalled? Neuroethics 2 (3):115-124.
Egbert Hardeman & Henk Jochemsen (2012). Are There Ideological Aspects to the Modernization of Agriculture? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5):657-674.
Evelyn B. Pluhar (2010). Meat and Morality: Alternatives to Factory Farming. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (5):455-468.
Christine Leeb (2011). The Concept of Animal Welfare at the Interface Between Producers and Scientists: The Example of Organic Pig Farming. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):173-183.
Mette Vaarst, Lis Alban, Lisbeth Mogensen, Stig Milan & Erik Steen Kristensen (2001). Health and Welfare in Danish Dairy Cattle in the Transition to Organic Production: Problems, Priorities and Perspectives. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (4):367-390.
Michael C. Appleby (2005). Sustainable Agriculture is Humane, Humane Agriculture is Sustainable. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):293-303.
Rose Zuzworsky (2001). From the Marketplace to the Dinner Plate: The Economy, Theology, and Factory Farming. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):177 - 188.
Matthew C. Halteman (2011). Varieties of Harm to Animals in Industrial Farming. Journal of Animal Ethics 1 (2):122-131.
Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe, Mette Vaarst & Erik Steen Kristensen (2001). Does Organic Farming Face Distinctive Livestock Welfare Issues? – A Conceptual Analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):275-299.
Brian Campbell (2000). CATO ON FARMING A. Dalby: Cato , On Farming (De Agricultura). A Modern Translation with Commentary . Pp. 243, 11 Ills. Totnes: Prospect Books, 1998. ISBN: 0907325-80-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):73-.
Abigail Woods (2007). The Farm as Clinic: Veterinary Expertise and the Transformation of Dairy Farming, 1930–1950. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (2):462-487.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads4 ( #240,681 of 1,096,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #246,097 of 1,096,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?