David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):195-196 (1998)
Chow sets his version of statistical significance testing in an impoverished context of “theory corroboration” that explicitly excludes well-posed theories admitting of strong support by precise empirical evidence. He demonstrates no scientific usefulness for the problematic procedure he recommends instead. The important role played by significance testing in today's behavioral and brain sciences is wholly inconsistent with the rhetoric he would enforce.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul E. Meehl (1967). Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox. Philosophy of Science 34 (2):103-115.
John R. Vokey (1998). Statistics Without Probability: Significance Testing as Typicality and Exchangeability in Data Analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):225-226.
Charles E. Boklage (1998). On the Position of Statistical Significance in the Epistemology of Experimental Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):195-195.
Jacques Poitevineau & Bruno Lecoutre (1998). Some Statistical Misconceptions in Chow's Statistical Significance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):215-215.
Henry Rouanet (1998). Significance Testing in a Bayesian Framework: Assessing Direction of Effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):217-218.
Zeno G. Swijtink (1998). A Plea for Popperian Significance Testing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):220-221.
Michael G. Shafto (1998). Costs and Benefits of Statistical Significance Tests. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):218-219.
John F. Kihlstrom (1998). If You've Got an Effect, Test its Significance; If You've Got a Weak Effect, Do a Meta-Analysis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):205-206.
Brian D. Haig (2000). Statistical Significance Testing, Hypothetico-Deductive Method, and Theory Evaluation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):292-293.
Günther Palm (1998). Significance Testing – Does It Need This Defence? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):214-215.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #207,220 of 1,696,468 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #342,645 of 1,696,468 )
How can I increase my downloads?