Graduate studies at Western
European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (3):435-449 (2011)
|Abstract||In Science as Social Knowledge in 1990 and The Fate of Knowledge in 2002, Helen Longino develops an epistemological theory known as Critical Contextual Empiricism (CCE). Knowledge production, she argues, is an active, value-laden practice, evidence is context dependent and relies on background assumptions, and science is a social inquiry that, under certain conditions, produces social knowledge with contextual objectivity. While Longino’s work has been generally well-received, there have been a number of criticisms of CCE raised in the philosophical literature in recent years. In this paper I outline the key elements of Longino’s theory and propose modifications to the four norms offered by the account. The version of CCE I defend, which draws on lessons learned by medical researchers in recent years, gives principles of epistemic diversity a central role and also provides greater specification of three of the four norms. Further, it offers additional resources for defending CCE against Alvin Goldman’s suggestion that there is a need for a “healthy dogmatism” in science, as well as a concern about “manufactured uncertainty” arising out of recent work by David Michaels. Finally, the modified version proposed here is also well positioned to respond (negatively) to a suggestion from Kristen Intemann that CCE needs to be adapted to incorporate a central insight from feminist standpoint theory. In light of the variety of social pressures influencing contemporary scientific research, and the role of science in shaping public policy, I argue that a rigorous social epistemology such as CCE is indispensable for understanding and assessing contemporary scientific practice|
|Keywords||Critical Contextual Empiricism Feminist epistemology Social epistemology Medical research Helen Longino Alvin Goldman David Michaels Kristen Intemann|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kirstin Borgerson, Amending and Defending Critical Contextual Empiricism: Lessons From Medical Research.
Stéphanie Ruphy (2006). "Empiricism All the Way Down": A Defense of the Value-Neutrality of Science in Response to Helen Longino's Contextual Empiricism. Perspectives on Science 14 (2):189-214.
Miriam Solomon & Alan Richardson (2005). A Critical Context for Longino's Critical Contextual Empiricism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (1):211-222.
Paul Dicken (2009). Constructive Empiricism and the Vices of Voluntarism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):189 – 201.
R. Ferrell (2003). Hume Reads Freud: Empiricism as Rhetorical Event. Critical Horizons 4 (2):265-280.
Omedi Ochieng (2008). The Epistemology of African Philosophy. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):337-359.
James Shelley (2010). Against Value Empiricism in Aesthetics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):707-720.
Justin B. Biddle (2009). Advocates or Unencumbered Selves? On the Role of Mill's Political Liberalism in Longino's Contextual Empiricism. Philosophy of Science 76 (5).
N. D. Belnap, H. Leblanc & R. H. Thomason (1963). On Not Strengthening Intuitionistic Logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 4 (4):313-320.
Sharon L. Crasnow (1993). Can Science Be Objective? Longino's Science as Social Knowledge. [REVIEW] Hypatia 8 (3):194-201.
Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (2013). In Defense of Nativism. Philosophical Studies 165 (2):693-718.
Seyla Benhabib (1996). The Local, the Contextual and/or Critical. Constellations 3 (1):83-95.
Brigitte Sassen (ed.) (2000). Kant's Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Kristen Intemann (2010). Years of Feminist Empiricism and Standpoint Theory: Where Are We Now? Hypatia 25 (4):778-796.
Added to index2011-09-17
Total downloads18 ( #74,535 of 729,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 729,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?