Accountability in Research 13:259-275 (2006)
|Abstract||Is it ethical to deceive the individuals who participate in psychological experiments for methodological reasons? We argue against an absolute ban on the use of deception in psychological research. The potential benefits of many psychological experiments involving deception consist in allowing individuals and society to gain morally significant self-knowledge that they could not otherwise gain. Research participants gain individual self-knowledge which can help them improve their autonomous decision-making. The community gains collective self-knowledge that, once shared, can play a role in shaping education, informing policies and in general creating a more efficient and just society.|
|Keywords||psychology deception self-knowledge|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alfred R. Mele (1999). Twisted Self-Deception. Philosophical Psychology 12 (2):117-137.
Jordi Fernández (2013). Self-Deception and Self-Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 162 (2):379-400.
M. R. Haight (1980). A Study Of Self-Deception. Sussex: Harvester Press.
David R. Pugmire (1969). 'Self'-Deception. Inquiry 12:339-361.
Neil Van Leeuwen (forthcoming). Self-Deception. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Blackwell.
Neil Van Leeuwen (2009). Self-Deception Won't Make You Happy. Social Theory and Practice 35 (1):107-132.
Rachel Brown (2004). The Emplotted Self: Self-Deception and Self-Knowledge. Philosophical Papers 32 (3):279-300.
Richard Holton (2001). What is the Role of the Self in Self-Deception? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (1):53-69.
David J. Pittenger (2002). Deception in Research: Distinctions and Solutions From the Perspective of Utilitarianism. Ethics and Behavior 12 (2):117 – 142.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads105 ( #5,566 of 549,119 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,119 )
How can I increase my downloads?