BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-6 (2006)
|Abstract||Background Studying the contribution of individual countries to leading journals in a specific discipline can highlight which countries have the most impact on that discipline and whether a geographic bias exists. This article aims to examine the international distribution of publications in the field of bioethics. Methods Retrospective quantitative study of nine peer reviewed journals in the field of bioethics and medical ethics (Bioethics, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Hastings Center Report, Journal of Clinical Ethics, Journal of Medical Ethics, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, Nursing Ethics, Christian Bioethics, and Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics). Results In total, 4,029 articles published between 1990 and 2003 were retrieved from the nine bioethical journals under study. The United States (59.3%, n = 2390), the United Kingdom (13.5%, n = 544), Canada (4%, n = 160) and Australia (3.8%, n = 154) had the highest number of publications in terms of absolute number of publications. When normalized to population size, smaller affluent countries, such as New Zealand, Finland and Sweden were more productive than the United States. The number of studies originating from the USA was decreasing in the period between 1990 and 2003. Conclusion While a lot of peer reviewed journals in the field of bioethics profile themselves as international journals, they certainly do not live up to what one would expect from an "international" journal. The fact that English speaking countries, and to a larger extent American authors, dominate the international journals in the field of bioethics is a clear geographic bias towards the bioethical discussions that are going on in these journals.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Subrata Chattopadhyay, Catherine Myser & Raymond De Vries (2013). Bioethics and Its Gatekeepers: Does Institutional Racism Exist in Leading Bioethics Journals? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (1):7-9.
James Coyne (2005). Lessons in Conflict of Interest: The Construction of the Martyrdom of David Healy and The Dilemma of Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):W3-W14.
Sofia Lombera & Judy Illes (2009). The International Dimensions of Neuroethics. Developing World Bioethics 9 (2):57-64.
H. Fangerau (2004). Finding European Bioethical Literature: An Evaluation of the Leading Abstracting and Indexing Services. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):299-303.
Pascal Borry, Paul Schotsmans & Kris Dierickx (2006). Author, Contributor or Just a Signer? A Quantitative Analysis of Authorship Trends in the Field of Bioethics. Bioethics 20 (4):213–220.
Ruth Macklin (2010). The Death of Bioethics (as We Once Knew It). Bioethics 24 (5):211-217.
David B. Resnik (1999). Sex Biases in Subject Selection: A Survey of Articles Published in American Medical Journals. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (3).
Jessica S. Ancker & Annette Flanagin (2007). A Comparison of Conflict of Interest Policies at Peer-Reviewed Journals in Different Scientific Disciplines. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2).
Søren Holm & Bryn Williams-Jones (2006). Global Bioethics – Myth or Reality? BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-10.
Sirkku K. Hellsten (2008). Global Bioethics: Utopia or Reality? Developing World Bioethics 8 (2):70-81.
Mindaugas Broga, Goran Mijaljica, Marcin Waligora, Aime Keis & Ana Marusic (2013). Publication Ethics in Biomedical Journals From Countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Science and Engineering Ethics:1-11.
Helene Marsh & Carole M. Eros (1999). Ethics of Field Research: Do Journals Set the Standard? Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (3):375-382.
Ronald M. Davis, Anne Victoria Neale & Joseph C. Monsur (2003). Medical Journals' Conflicts of Interest in the Publication of Book Reviews. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):471-483.
A. L. I. Joseph, Adnan A. Hyder & Nancy E. Kass (2012). Research Ethics Capacity Development in Africa: Exploring a Model for Individual Success. Developing World Bioethics 12 (2):55-62.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-11-17
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?