Why reading the title isn’t good enough: An evaluation of the 4S approach to evidence-based medicine

International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (2):152-175 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Proponents of evidence-based medicine have recently suggested a “4S” approach to clinical decision making in which physicians are advised to rely on increasingly abstract summaries of the available research evidence. This retreat from the original data of medical research is ill-advised: it extends an unjustified evidence hierarchy, overestimates the role of computer systems, divides communities, discards evidence, ignores contexts, and devalues broad critical evaluation. I draw upon feminist social epistemology to evaluate the 4S approach to EBM and to suggest means for improving the evidence base of medical research and practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ideas and ideals in medicine: fruits of reason or props of power?Olli S. Miettinen - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (2):107-116.
What evidence in evidence-based medicine?John Worrall - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S316-S330.
The hard art of soft science: Evidence‐Based Medicine, Reasoned Medicine or both?Milos Jenicek - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (4):410-419.
The virtues of evidence.Erica Zarkovich & R. E. G. Upshur - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):403-412.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-10

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kirstin Borgerson
Dalhousie University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references