David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):73-86 (2010)
Technology assessment (TA) is an important instrument for the regulation of innovation. From the perspective of sociology of knowledge, the regulatory process can be understood as a complex interplay between different forms of knowledge. The prevailing instruments of TA, expertise and participation, are both facing difficulties in dealing with the limits and impasses of regulatory knowledge in the realm of innovation. Nevertheless, as is argued in this article, reflexive forms of TA offer a good, if not the only, answer to the question of how we can deal with the contradictions and paradoxes involved in the regulation of innovation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Silvio O. Funtowicz & Jerome R. Ravetz (1993). The Emergence of Post-Normal Science. In René von Schomberg (ed.), Science, Politics, and Morality: Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making. Kluwer Academic Publishers 85--123.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Markus F. Peschl & Thomas Fundneider (2008). Emergent Innovation—a Socio-Epistemological Innovation Technology. Creating Profound Change and Radically New Knowledge as Core Challenges in Knowledge Management. In Lytras M. D. (ed.), The Open Knowledge Society: A Computer Science and Information Systems Manifesto. Springer 101-108.
ShanKan He (2008). 文化•创新文化•自主创新. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 22:143-157.
Lucia Garcia-Lorenzo (2006). Networking in Organizations: Developing a Social Practice Perspective for Innovation and Knowledge Sharing in Emerging Work Contexts. World Futures 62 (3):171 – 192.
Benoît Godin (2010). Innovation Without the Word: William F. Ogburn's Contribution to the Study of Technological Innovation. [REVIEW] Minerva 48 (3):277-307.
Vincent di Norcia (2005). Intellectual Property and the Commercialization of Research and Development. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):203-219.
Vincent Norcia (2005). Intellectual Property and the Commercialization of Research and Development. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):203-219.
Arjan van Rooij (2013). Gaps and Plugs: TNO, and the Problems of Getting Knowledge Out of Laboratories. Minerva 51 (1):25-48.
Yu-Shan Chen, Shyh-Bao Lai & Chao-Tung Wen (2006). The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 67 (4):331 - 339.
Alexander Peine (2011). Challenging Incommensurability: What We Can Learn From Ludwik Fleck for the Analysis of Configurational Innovation. Minerva 49 (4):489-508.
William Davies (2011). Knowing the Unknowable: The Epistemological Authority of Innovation Policy Experts. Social Epistemology 25 (4):401 - 421.
Benoît Godin (2012). “Innovation Studies”: The Invention of a Specialty. [REVIEW] Minerva 50 (4):397-421.
Harold Silver (1999). Managing to Innovate in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (2):145 - 156.
Anne Barraquier (2011). The Influence of Social and Ethical Issues on Innovation. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 22:176-188.
Shinichi Doi & Keiji Yamada (2011). Symbiotic Technology for Creating Social Innovation 30 Years in the Future. AI and Society 26 (3):197-204.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads8 ( #409,756 of 1,934,424 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,207 of 1,934,424 )
How can I increase my downloads?