- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Nonpropositional Content in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Advertisements
American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):14-16 (2013)
Abstract
No abstractMy notes
Similar books and articles
The ethical challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.Cheryl Berg & Kelly Fryer-Edwards - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):17 - 31.
Informed Consent in Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: The Outline of A Model between Specific and Generic Consent.Eline M. Bunnik, A. Cecile J. W. Janssens & Maartje H. N. Schermer - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (3):343-351.
Direct to confusion: Lessons learned from marketing brca testing.Ellen Matloff & Arthur Caplan - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (6):5 – 8.
Direct-to-consumer advertisements for prescription drugs as an argumentative activity type.Renske Wierda & Jacky Visser - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):81-96.
The depiction of senior citizens in magazine advertisements: A content analysis. [REVIEW]Robin T. Peterson - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (9):701 - 706.
Recent Developments in Health Care Law: Culture and Controversy. [REVIEW]Roberta M. Berry, Lisa Bliss, Sylvia Caley, Paul A. Lombardo & Leslie E. Wolf - 2013 - HEC Forum 25 (1):1-24.
Argumentation and risk communication about genetic testing: Challenges for healthcare consumers and implications for computer systems.Nancy L. Green - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):113-129.
The New Genetics and Informed Consent: Differentiating Choice to Preserve Autonomy.Eline M. Bunnik, Antina Jong, Niels Nijsingh & Guido M. W. R. Wert - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (6):348-355.
Let the consumer decide? The regulation of commercial genetic testing.D. M. Levitt - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (6):398-403.
Pharmaceutical advertisements: How they deceive patients. [REVIEW]Ashish Chandra & Gary A. Holt - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 18 (4):359 - 366.
Parental authority, future autonomy, and assessing risks of predictive genetic testing in Minors.A. Boyce & P. Borry - 2009 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (3):379-385.
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests and the Right to Know.Ronni Sandroff - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (5):24-25.
Swabbing Students: Should Universities Be Allowed to Facilitate Educational DNA Testing?Shawneequa L. Callier - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (4):32-40.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-26
Downloads
35 (#445,257)
6 months
8 (#342,364)
2013-10-26
Downloads
35 (#445,257)
6 months
8 (#342,364)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Direct-to-consumer genomics on the scales of autonomy.Effy Vayena - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4):310-314.
Medicine, market and communication: ethical considerations in regard to persuasive communication in direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.Manuel Schaper & Silke Schicktanz - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):1-11.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising”.Paul Biegler & Patrick Vargas - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):W1-W5.
‘Just a Bit of Fun’: How Recreational is Direct-to-Customer Genetic Testing?Heike Felzmann - 2015 - The New Bioethics 21 (1):20-32.
References found in this work
Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising.Paul Biegler & Patrick Vargas - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):3-13.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ban the Sunset? Nonpropositional Content and Regulation of Pharmaceutical Advertising”.Paul Biegler & Patrick Vargas - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):W1-W5.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Is it the Practice of Medicine?Cynthia Marietta & Amy L. McGuire - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (2):369-374.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Cynthia Marietta & Amy L. McGuire - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (2):369-374.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Cynthia Marietta & Amy L. McGuire - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (2):369-374.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo