David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 13 (2):213-228 (2000)
Current cognitive science models of perception and action assume that the objects that we move toward and perceive are represented as determinate in our experience of them. A proper phenomenology of perception and action, however, shows that we experience objects indeterminately when we are perceiving them or moving toward them. This indeterminacy, as it relates to simple movement and perception, is captured in the proposed phenomenologically based recurrent network models of brain function. These models provide a possible foundation from which predicative structures may arise as an emergent phenomenon without the positing of a representing subject. These models go some way in addressing the dual constraints of phenomenological accuracy and neurophysiological plausibility that ought to guide all projects devoted to discovering the physical basis of human experience
|Keywords||Brain Neural Network Phenomenology Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Maxwell J. D. Ramstead (2015). Naturalizing What? Varieties of Naturalism and Transcendental Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (4):929-971.
Similar books and articles
Stan Franklin & Max Garzon (1992). On Stability and Solvability (or, When Does a Neural Network Solve a Problem?). Minds and Machines 2 (1):71-83.
Peter F. Dominey (2000). A Moveable Feast. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):537-538.
Stuart R. Hameroff (1998). More Neural Than Thou (Reply to Churchland). In S. Ameroff, Alfred W. Kaszniak & A. C. Scott (eds.), Toward a Science of Consciousness Ii: The 1996 Tucson Discussions and Debates. MIT Press
Roman Borisyuk, Galina Borisyuk & Yakov Kazanovich (1998). Synchronization of Neural Activity and Information Processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):833-833.
Paul A. Koch & Gerry Leisman (2004). The Local is Running on the Express Track: Localist Models Better Facilitate Understanding of Nervous System Function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):700-700.
Jay Schulkin (2006). Cognitive Functions, Bodily Sensibility and the Brain. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (3-4):341-349.
Donald Borrett, Sean D. Kelly & Hon Kwan (2000). Bridging Embodied Cognition and Brain Function: The Role of Phenomenology. Philosophical Psychology 13 (2):261-266.
Enrico Blanzieri (1997). Dynamical Learning Algorithms for Neural Networks and Neural Constructivism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):559-559.
Guy C. Van Orden & Marian A. Jansen op de Haar (2000). Schneider's Apraxia and the Strained Relation Between Experience and Description. Philosophical Psychology 13 (2):247 – 259.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2008). Some Neural Networks Compute, Others Don't. Neural Networks 21 (2-3):311-321.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #71,351 of 1,906,958 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #345,326 of 1,906,958 )
How can I increase my downloads?