Foundations of Science 17 (3):245-276 (2012)
|Abstract||Cauchy’s contribution to the foundations of analysis is often viewed through the lens of developments that occurred some decades later, namely the formalisation of analysis on the basis of the epsilon-delta doctrine in the context of an Archimedean continuum. What does one see if one refrains from viewing Cauchy as if he had read Weierstrass already? One sees, with Felix Klein, a parallel thread for the development of analysis, in the context of an infinitesimal-enriched continuum. One sees, with Emile Borel, the seeds of the theory of rates of growth of functions as developed by Paul du Bois-Reymond. One sees, with E. G. Björling, an infinitesimal definition of the criterion of uniform convergence. Cauchy’s foundational stance is hereby reconsidered|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Piotr Błaszczyk, Mikhail G. Katz & David Sherry (2013). Ten Misconceptions From the History of Analysis and Their Debunking. Foundations of Science 18 (1):43-74.
Mikhail G. Katz & David Tall (2013). A Cauchy-Dirac Delta Function. Foundations of Science 18 (1):107-123.
Karin Katz & Mikhail Katz (2012). A Burgessian Critique of Nominalistic Tendencies in Contemporary Mathematics and its Historiography. Foundations of Science 17 (1):51-89.
Karin U. Katz & Mikhail G. Katz (2011). Cauchy's Continuum. Perspectives on Science 19 (4):426-452.
Kajsa Bråting (2012). Ambiguities of Fundamental Concepts in Mathematical Analysis During the Mid-Nineteenth Century. Foundations of Science 17 (4):301-320.
Tyler Marghetis & Rafael Núñez (2013). The Motion Behind the Symbols: A Vital Role for Dynamism in the Conceptualization of Limits and Continuity in Expert Mathematics. Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (2):299-316.
Mikhail G. Katz & Thomas Mormann, Infinitesimals and Other Idealizing Completions in Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Mathematics.
Erik Palmgren (1998). Developments in Constructive Nonstandard Analysis. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):233-272.
Stephen G. Simpson (1984). Which Set Existence Axioms Are Needed to Prove the Cauchy/Peano Theorem for Ordinary Differential Equations? Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (3):783-802.
Ivor Grattan-Guinness (1997). Vida En Común, Vidas Separadas. Sobre Las Interacciones Entre Matematicas Y Lógicas Desde la Revolución Francesa Hasta la Primera Guerra Mundial [Living Together and Living Apart. On the Interactions Between Mathematics and Logics From the French Revolution to the First World War]. Theoria 12 (1):13-37.
J. C. Cifuentes, A. M. Sette & D. Mundici (1996). Cauchy Completeness in Elementary Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (4):1153-1157.
Nigel Cutland, Christoph Kessler, Ekkehard Kopp & David Ross (1988). On Cauchy's Notion of Infinitesimal. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):375-378.
Robert S. Lubarsky & Michael Rathjen (2008). On the Constructive Dedekind Reals. Logic and Analysis 1 (2):131-152.
Added to index2011-08-10
Total downloads6 ( #147,054 of 556,837 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )
How can I increase my downloads?