Utilitas 15 (03):308- (2009)
|Abstract||With very advanced technology, a very large population of people living happy lives could be sustained in the accessible region of the universe. For every year that development of such technologies and colonization of the universe is delayed, there is therefore an opportunity cost: a potential good, lives worth living, is not being realized. Given some plausible assumptions, this cost is extremely large. However, the lesson for utilitarians is not that we ought to maximize the pace of technological development, but rather that we ought to maximize its safety, i.e. the probability that colonization will eventually occur|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Pimentel (1990). Environmental and Social Implications of Waste in U.S. Agriculture and Food Sectors. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (1):5-20.
Patrick Primeaux & John Stieber (1997). Managing Business Ethics and Opportunity Costs. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (8):835-842.
A. Pablo Iannone (ed.) (1987). Contemporary Moral Controversies in Technology. Oxford University Press.
Arthur MacEwan (1995). Technological Options and Free Trade Agreements. Science and Society 59 (1):9 - 37.
Richard Arias-Hernandez (2004). Learning Communities That Build Appropriate Technology. World Futures 60 (1 & 2):81 – 90.
John O'Dea (2007). The Value in Equal Opportunity: Reply to Kershnar. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):177–187.
Ilkka Niiniluoto (1990). Should Technological Imperatives Be Obeyed? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (2):181 – 189.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #58,767 of 549,117 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,117 )
How can I increase my downloads?