David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):333-355 (1986)
Although Calvin does not examine the nature and function of conscience in his typically systematic fashion, this article contends that a fairly consistent and coherent view of conscience emerges from the two metaphors accompanying Calvin's frequent appeals to conscience. Calvin utilizes judicial metaphors when dealing with the cognitive element and metaphors of violence when addressing the emotive element of conscience. Through these metaphors Calvin represents conscience as a process of casuistic reasoning and, more innovatively, as impervious to the corruptions of self-deception. This innovation enables Calvin to offer some constructive insights into the repressed conscience and to jettison the will as a necessary component of conscience
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David L. Foxgrover (1987). A Scrap of Bread and a Right Conscience. In Peter De Klerk (ed.), Calvin and Christian Ethics: Papers and Responses Presented at the Fifth Colloquium on Calvin & Calvin Studies Sponsored by the Calvin Studies Society Held at the Calvin Theological Seminary, Grand Rapids, Michigan, on May 8 and 9, 1985. Calvin Studies Society.
Mark C. Murphy (1997). The Conscience Principle. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
James Calvin Davis (2005). William Ames's Calvinist Ambiguity Over Freedom of Conscience. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):333 - 355.
Daniel P. Sulmasy (2008). What is Conscience and Why is Respect for It so Important? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
Peter Godman (2009). Paradoxes of Conscience in the High Middle Ages: Abelard, Heloise, and the Archpoet. Cambridge University Press.
William Lyons (2009). Conscience – an Essay in Moral Psychology. Philosophy 84 (4):477-494.
Allen Speight (2011). Conscientious Agency and the Life of Modernity. The Owl of Minerva 43 (1-2):125-138.
Donovan Miyasaki (2010). Nietzsche Contra Freud on Bad Conscience. Nietzsche-Studien 39 (1):434-454.
John J. Hardt (2008). The Conscience Debate: Resources for Rapprochement From the Problem's Perceived Source. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):151-160.
Michael W. Hickson (2010). Conscientious Refusals Without Conscience. Philo 13 (2):167-184.
Ronald Ledek (1996). The Nature of Conscience and its Religious Significance with a Special Reference to John Henry Newman. International Scholars Publications.
Matthew Beard (2011). Two Views of Conscience for the Australian People. Solidarity 1 (1).
Ryan E. Lawrence & Farr A. Curlin (2007). Clash of Definitions: Controversies About Conscience in Medicine. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):10 – 14.
Kyle Swan & Kevin Vallier (2012). The Normative Significance of Conscience. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (3):1-21.
Added to index2011-01-04
Total downloads10 ( #165,643 of 1,410,536 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #178,988 of 1,410,536 )
How can I increase my downloads?