Futures 35 (8):901-906 (2003)
|Abstract||In an earlier paper in this journal, I sought to defend the claims that (1) substantial probability should be assigned to the hypothesis that machines will outsmart humans within 50 years, (2) such an event would have immense ramifications for many important areas of human concern, and that consequently (3) serious attention should be given to this scenario. Here, I will address a number of points made by several commentators|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Xavier Guchet (2007). Nanomachine. Techné 11 (1):71-89.
Michael J. Behe (2001). Reply to My Critics: A Response to Reviews of Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):683-707.
Rosemarie Velik (2010). Why Machines Cannot Feel. Minds and Machines 20 (1):1-18.
George Nakhnikian (2004). It Ain't Necessarily So: An Essay Review of Intelligent Design Creationism and its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives. Philosophy of Science 71 (4):593-604.
Elliott Sober (2008). Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, and Minds—a Reply to John Beaudoin. Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):443-446.
J. Storrs Hall (2006). Nano-Enabled AI. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2):247-261.
Luis Monta�O. Hirose (1995). Organisational Spaces and Intelligent Machines: A Metaphorical Approach to Ethics. [REVIEW] AI and Society 9 (1):43-56.
Peter Kugel (2002). Computing Machines Can't Be Intelligent (...And Turing Said So). Minds and Machines 12 (4):563-579.
David J. Chalmers (2010). The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (9-10):9 - 10.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #53,550 of 722,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?