Whitehead and Russell on points

Philosophia Mathematica 18 (1):1-52 (2010)
This paper considers the attempts put forward by A.N. Whitehead and by Bertrand Russell to ‘construct’ points (and temporal instants) from what they regard as the more basic concept of extended ‘regions’. It is shown how what they each say themselves will not do, and how it should be filled out and amended so that the ‘construction’ may be regarded as successful. Finally there is a brief discussion of whether this ‘construction’ is worth pursuing, or whether it is better—as in today’s mathematics—to prefer a ‘construction’ that goes the other way round, i.e. , to view a region as a set of points
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Paul Benacerraf (1965). What Numbers Could Not Be. Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
    Bowman L. Clark (1985). Individuals and Points. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 26 (1):61-75.
    Bowman L. Clarke (1981). A Calculus of Individuals Based on ``Connection''. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (3):204-218.

    View all 10 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    68 ( #17,542 of 1,089,156 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,735 of 1,089,156 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.