Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Jim Bourassa & David Thomson (2006). A New Foundation for Physics. Infinite Energy Magazine (69):34.Modern physics describes the mechanics of the Universe. We have discovered a new foundation for physics, which explains the components of the Universe with precision and depth. We quantify the existence of Aether, subatomic particles, and the force laws. Some aspects of the theory derive from the Standard Model, but much is unique. A key discovery from this new foundation is a mathematically correct Unified Force Theory. Other fundamental discoveries follow, including the origin of the fine structure constant and subatomic particle g-factors, a slight correction of neutron magnetic moment, a geometrical structure for charge, the quantification of electromagnetic charge as separate from electrostatic charge, a more precise meaning of spin, the quantification of space-resonance in five dimensions, and a new system of quantum units. The Aether quantifies as a fabric of quantum rotating magnetic fields with electromagnetic, electrostatic, and gravitational dipole structures. Subatomic particles quantify as angular momentum encapsulated in a quantum, rotating magnetic field. All quantum, atomic, and molecular processes can be precisely modeled, leading to discrete physics with new understandings and insights.
Similar books and articles
Einstein, philosophical belief and physical theory -- Introduction to quantum theory -- Quantum theory, the Bohr-Einstein debate -- Physics and society.
The concept of the vacuum in quantum field theory is a subtle one. Vacuum states have a rich and complex set of properties that produce distinctive, though usually exceedingly small, physical effects. Quantum vacuum noise is familiar in optical and electronic devices, but in this paper I wish to consider extending the discussion to systems in which gravitation, or large accelerations, are important. This leads to the prediction of vacuum friction: The quantum vacuum can act in a manner reminiscent of a viscous fluid. One result is that rapidly changing gravitational fields can create particles from the vacuum, and in turn the backreaction on the gravitational dynamics operates like a damping force. I consider such effects in early universe cosmology and the theory of quantum black holes, including the possibility that the large-scale structure of the universe might be produced by quantum vacuum noise in an early inflationary phase. I also discuss the curious phenomenon that an observer who accelerates through a quantum vacuum perceives a bath of thermal radiation closely analogous to Hawking radiation from black holes, even though an inertial observer registers no particles. The effects predicted raise very deep and unresolved issues about the nature of quantum particles, the role of the observer, and the relationship between the quantum vacuum and the concepts of information and entropy. © 2001 American Institute of Physics.
Theory of everything must include consciousness. In this Part I of the series of three
articles, we introduce the subjective experience (SE) and/or proto‐experience (PE)
aspect of consciousness in classical physics, where PEs are precursors of SEs. In our dualaspect‐
dual‐mode PE‐SE framework, it was hypothesized that fundamental entities
(strings or elementary particles: fermions and bosons) have two aspects: (i) material
aspect such as mass, charge, spin, and space‐time, and (ii) mental aspect, such as
experiences. There are three competing hypotheses: (1) superposition based H1 (SEs/PEs
are superposed in the mental aspect of entities; when a specific stimulus is presented to
the neural‐network, the associated specific SE is selected by the matching and selection
process and experienced by this network), (2) superposition‐then‐integration based H2
(only PEs are superposed, which are integrated by neural‐Darwinism leading to specific
SEs) and (3) integration based H3 (each entity has its own PE, which keeps on
transforming appropriately as matter evolves from elementary particles to neuralnetworks;
it is a dual‐aspect panpsychism). We found that the followings, in classical
physics, are invariant under the PE‐SE transformation: electromagnetic strength tensor,
electromagnetic stress‐energy tensor, the electromagnetic theory (Maxwell's
equations), Newtonian gravitational field, the entropic force, Special and General
Theory of Relativity. Our analysis suggests that (i) SEs are embedded in space‐time
geometry for the structure of space‐time (empty space or the vacuum without matter).
(ii) For matter field, SEs can move with spatiotemporal coordinates of matter because it
is in the mental aspect of matter as both mental and material aspects are always
together in the dual‐aspect‐dual‐mode optimal PE‐SE framework. (iii) Our specific SE is
the result of matching and selection processes and can change with space and time. For
example, the experience redness has V4/V8/VO‐red‐green neural‐network with rednessstate
as neural correlates. When a subject moves, the specific SE redness also moves
with the subject’s correlated neural‐network. In addition, SEs can change with time as
stimuli change. In other words, SEs in a subject change with space‐time. We conclude
that it is possible to introduce the SE/PE aspect of consciousness in classical physics. In
Parts II and III, the SE aspect of consciousness will be introduced in orthodox quantum
physics and modern quantum physics (such as loop quantum gravity and string theory),
respectively. Thus, the introduction of the SE aspect of consciousness in physics leads us
to unify consciousness with known four fundamental forces, which entails towards a
theory of everything.
No categories
Some conceptual problems of quantum theory, by A. Fine.--Philosophical implications of contemporary particle physics, by G. Feinberg.--The physics of logic, by D. Finkelstein.--The nature of quantum mechanical reality: Einstein versus Bohr, by C. A. Hooker.--A formal approach to the philosophy of science, by B. C. Van Fraassen.--On the conceptual structure of quantum mechanics, by H. Stein.
This volume introduces some of the basic philosophical and conceptual questions underlying the formulation of quantum mechanics, one of the most baffling and far-reaching aspects of modern physics. The book consists of articles by leading thinkers in this field, who have been inspired by the profound work of the late John Bell. Some of the deepest issues concerning the nature of physical reality are debated, including the theory of physical measurements, how to test quantum mechanics, and how classical and quantum physics are related. This book will be of interest to students with a background in quantum physics, who wish to explore in more detail its philosophical aspects, practising scientists who are not content with blindly applying the rules of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in gaining a deeper understanding of the philosophy of physics.
We investigate the validity of the field explanation of the wave function by analyzing the mass and charge density distributions of a quantum system. It is argued that a charged quantum system has effective mass and charge density distributing in space, proportional to the square of the absolute value of its wave function. This is also a consequence of protective measurement. If the wave function is a physical field, then the mass and charge density will be distributed in space simultaneously for a charged quantum system, and thus there will exist a remarkable electrostatic self-interaction of its wave function, though the gravitational self-interaction is too weak to be detected presently. This not only violates the superposition principle of quantum mechanics but also contradicts experimental observations. Thus we conclude that the wave function cannot be a description of a physical field. In the second part of this paper, we further analyze the implications of these results for the main realistic interpretations of quantum mechanics, especially for de Broglie-Bohm theory. It has been argued that de Broglie-Bohm theory gives the same predictions as quantum mechanics by means of quantum equilibrium hypothesis. However, this equivalence is based on the premise that the wave function, regarded as a Ψ-field, has no mass and charge density distributions, which turns out to be wrong according to the above results. For a charged quantum system, both Ψ-field and Bohmian particle have charge density distribution. This then results in the existence of an electrostatic self-interaction of the field and an electromagnetic interaction between the field and Bohmian particle, which contradicts both the predictions of quantum mechanics and experimental observations. Therefore, de Broglie-Bohm theory as a realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics is probably wrong. Lastly, we suggest that the wave function is a description of some sort of ergodic motion (e.g. random discontinuous motion) of particles, and we also briefly analyze the implications of this suggestion for other realistic interpretations of quantum mechanics including many-worlds interpretation and dynamical collapse theories.
The Quantum AetherDynamics hypothesis reinstates a more sophisticated version of the ancient and universal idea of an Aether substratum to explain the highly successful Relativity and Quantum Field Theories. In this Theory of Everything, a Planck-scale Aether is the fabric of space, and fundamental particles are spinning vortices or solitons of this Aether. My hypothesis states that the phase relationship between waves entrained in a spinning vortex of Aether results in the actual particle type. Quantum AetherDynamics provides a fluid version of Special Relativity, a non-Euclidean version of General Relativity, a topological version of Quantum Mechanics, and a vortice version of String Theory.
v. 1. Mathematical expression of the main categories of philosophy and logic -- Kinematics and dynamics of exchange -- v. 2. Structure of space of the universe -- electrostatic and electromagnetic fields -- Particles and exchange in the electromagnetic field -- v. 3. Atomic structure of matter-space-time and physical properties of substance -- Physics and philosophy.
The fine structure constant α ≡ e2/ c ≈ 1/137 is one of the fundamental parameters of the standard model of particle physics. There is a long history of attempts to derive the measured value of α from an underlying theory, or exhibit it in the form of a compact mathematical expression [2–4, 6, 8, 14–16]. The most significant advance in this endeavour was made by Dirac, who showed that if magnetic monopoles exist, with magnetic charge μ, then..
No categories
The laws of physics were not handed down from above. Neither are they rules somehow built into the structure of the universe. They are ingredients of the models that physicists invent to describe observations. Rather than being restrictions on the behavior of matter, the laws of physics are restrictions on the behavior of physicists. If the models of physics are to describe observations based on an objective reality, then those models cannot depend on the point of view of the observer. This suggests a principle of point-of-view invariance that is equivalent to the principle of covariance when applied to space-time. As Noether showed, space-time symmetries lead to the principles of energy, linear momentum, and angular momentum conservation--essentially all of classical mechanics. It also leads to Lorentz invariance and special relativity. When generalized to the abstract space of functions such as the quantum state vector, point-of-view invariance is identified with gauge invariance. Quantum mechanics is then just the mathematics of gauge transformations with no additional assumptions needed to obtain its rules, including the superposition and uncertainty principles. The conservation and quantization of electric charge follow from global gauge invariance. The electromagnetic force is introduced to preserve local gauge invariance. Although not discussed here, the other forces in the standard model of elementary particles are also fields introduced to preserve local gauge invariance. Gravity can also be viewed as such a field. Thus practically all of fundamental physics as we know it follows directly from the single principle of point-of-view invariance.
Discussion of Jim Bourassa & David Thomson, A New Foundation for Physics
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

